Small cities • 2016

Obec Rapotín

IČO 00635901

Good buyer. Tender documentation is well prepared, thus there is no need to modify or cancel the procedure. The competition for contracts is high.

53.
ranking
76%
zIndex

Bidder participation

Is the level of competition satisfactory?   detailed info 

82%
average 59%
Largest contracts
Industry
Bids
„Nová budova radnice v Rapotíně“
Stavební práce
16
Ø5 in industry
Rekonstrukce místní komunikace Za Hutí v Rapotíně
Stavební úpravy pro komunikace
4
Ø5 in industry
Novostavba objektu šaten v areálu TJ Jiskra Rapotín
Stavební práce
12
Ø5 in industry
Vyhlídková věž s odpočívadlem - Přední Bukový kopec
Stavební práce
5
Ø5 in industry
Zkvalitnění systému separace odpadů v obci Rapotín
Výkopové a zemní práce
8
Ø4 in industry

Winner concentration

Isn't majority of contracts awarded to small circle of firms?   detailed info 

57%
average 51%
Largest suppliers Contracts count Contracts volume Kč
Irstav, s.r.o.
1 18,706,884
Strabag a.s.
1 7,869,337
Rakord - R & R, spol. s r.o.
1 7,489,984
Manax s.r.o.
1 5,451,276
Ekozis spol. s r. o.
1 4,376,858
Other suppliers 1 2,574,000

Pro-competitive tools

Does the buyer foster the competition by using the available tools?   detailed info 

50%
average 64%
Tool Contracts count
Extended deadlines 0% (0 from 0)
Nonprice competition 0% (0 from 2)
Division into lots 0% (0 from 2)
E-auction 0% (0 from 2)
Innovative procedure 0% ( from 2)

Competitive contracting

How often does buyer use non-competitive procedures?   detailed info 

100%
average 84%
No contracts in negotiated procedure without publication.

Consistent conduct

Does buyer discourage bidders by frequent competition cancellations or modifications?   detailed info 

100%
average 69%
Type of flaw Result
Issued tenders without published result 0%
Cancelled contracts 0%
Average requirements modifications count 0

Journal data quality

Does buyer publish vital data in official journal?   detailed info 

63%
average 80%
Type of flaw Contracts count
Bidders count not published 0% (0 from 6)
Final or estimated price not published 0% (0 from 6)
Procedure type not published 0% (0 from 6)
Missing supplier ID 0% (0 from 6)
Missing buyer ID 0% (0 from 6)
Wrong buyer name 0% (0 from 6)
Missing call for tenders 50% (3 from 6)
Missing winning price 0% ( from 6)
Contract modification by more than 50 % 0% ( from 6)

Supplier rating

Do the risky firms win frequently?   detailed info 

94%
average 85%
Type of flaw Contracts count
Supplier founded less than 180 days before contract award 0% (0 from 6)
Supplier with over 75 % of turnover from public procurement 0% (0 from 6)
Subcontractor share above 50 % 0% (0 from 6)
Supplier demise shortly after contract 0% (0 from 6)
Supplier bankruptcy 0% (0 from 6)
Supplier donating to political party 0% (0 from 6)
Supplier did not publish financial results on time 17% (1 from 6)