Large cities • 2016

Statutární město Teplice

IČO 00266621

Small number of firms recieve most of contracts.

Bidder participation

Is the level of competition satisfactory?   detailed info 

38%
average 63%

Winner concentration

Isn't majority of contracts awarded to small circle of firms?   detailed info 

45%
average 76%
Largest suppliers Contracts count Contracts volume (Kč)
Marius Pedersen a.s.
10 219,628,951
Eltodo-citelum, s.r.o.
1 30,351,964
Škoda Electric a.s.
1 28,095,000
Euromont Group a.s.
2 25,389,619
Mostecká montážní a.s.
2 23,713,705
Other suppliers 19 69,407,548

Public procurement share on total purchases

What fraction of purchases was made under procurement law?   detailed info 

59%
average 57%
Purchases Volume (Kč)
Public procurement 396,586,792
Unregulated purchases 747,481,482
Total 1,144,068,274

Competitive contracting

How often does buyer use non-competitive procedures?   detailed info 

100%
average 77%
Contract
Reason for negotiated procedure without publication
Price (Kč)
Zajištění energetických úspor Základní školy Verdunská 2958 - vícepráce
Dodatečné práce
96,064
Zajištění energetických úspor Základní školy Maršovská 1575/2 - vícepráce
Dodatečné práce
39,916

Consistent conduct

Does buyer discourage bidders by frequent competition cancellations or modifications?   detailed info 

58%
average 65%
Type of flaw Result
Issued calls without published result 15%
Cancelled contracts 23%
Average requirements modifications count 0.23

Journal data quality

Does buyer publish vital data in official journal?   detailed info 

83%
average 83%
Type of flaw Contracts count
Bidders count not published 0% (0 from 35)
Final or estimated price not published 26% (9 from 35)
Procedure type not published 0% (0 from 35)
Missing supplier ID 3% (1 from 35)
Missing buyer ID 0% (0 from 35)
Wrong buyer name 0% (0 from 35)
Call and award notices contradict each other 0% (0 from 35)
Missing call for tenders 37% (13 from 35)

Buyer profile data quality

Does the buyer profile fulfill the legal requirements?   detailed info 

33%
average 46%
Check Result
Is the buyers website consistent with central procurement registry? 40% (contracts)
Are there obvious flaws or inconsistencies within the data? 0.64 (average mistakes per contract)

Supplier rating

Do the risky firms win frequently?   detailed info 

73%
average 84%
Type of flaw Contracts count
Supplier founded less than 180 days before contract award 0% (0 from 35)
Supplier with over 75 % of turnover from public procurement 0% (0 from 35)
Subcontractor share above 50 % 3% (1 from 35)
Supplier demise shortly after contract 0% (0 from 35)
Supplier bankruptcy 0% (0 from 35)
Supplier donating to political party 29% (10 from 35)
Supplier did not publish financial results on time 6% (2 from 35)