Large cities • 2018 • past ranking

Statutární město Teplice

IČO 00266621

Buyer profile lacks mandatory machine readability. Buyer has seriously violated procurement law.

Bidder participation

Is the level of competition satisfactory?   detailed info 

58%
average 52%

Winner concentration

Isn't majority of contracts awarded to small circle of firms?   detailed info 

59%
average 70%
Largest suppliers Contracts count Contracts volume Kč
Marius Pedersen a.s.
7 281,490,717
SYNER, s.r.o.
1 189,611,415
EUROMONT GROUP a.s.
2 67,764,977
ŠKODA ELECTRIC a.s.
1 62,900,000
ELTODO-CITELUM, s.r.o.
1 30,351,965
Other suppliers 20 107,896,447

Pro-competitive tools

Does the buyer foster the competition by using the available tools?   detailed info 

50%
average 71%
Tool Contracts count
Extended deadlines 50% (6 from 12)
Nonprice competition 0% (0 from 14)
Division into lots 0% (0 from 14)
E-auction 0% (0 from 14)
Innovative procedure 0% ( from 14)

Public procurement share on total purchases

What fraction of purchases was made under procurement law?   detailed info 

69%
average 56%
Purchases Volume (Kč)
Public procurement 915,759,038
Small scale tenders 0
Unregulated purchases 1,025,019,247
Total 1,940,778,285

Competitive contracting

How often does buyer use non-competitive procedures?   detailed info 

99%
average 87%
Contract
Reason for negotiated procedure without publication
Original contract (Kč) Contract modification / NPWP (Kč)
Oprava povrchů – Kolonáda, Mírové náměstí - vícepráce
Additional works
- 1,496,129
PD - Krytá ledová plocha Na Stínadlech, Teplice- vícepráce
Technical exclusivity , Authorship rights , Additional works
- 80,000

Consistent conduct

Does buyer discourage bidders by frequent competition cancellations or modifications?   detailed info 

64%
average 77%
Type of flaw Result
Issued tenders without published result 14%
Cancelled contracts 21%
Average requirements modifications count 0.29

Journal data quality

Does buyer publish vital data in official journal?   detailed info 

95%
average 90%
Type of flaw Contracts count
Bidders count not published 0% (0 from 39)
Final or estimated price not published 38% (15 from 39)
Procedure type not published 0% (0 from 39)
Missing supplier ID 0% (0 from 39)
Missing buyer ID 0% (0 from 39)
Wrong buyer name 0% (0 from 39)
Missing call for tenders 5% (2 from 39)
Missing winning price 0% ( from 39)
Contract modification by more than 50 % 0% ( from 39)

Buyer profile data quality

Does the buyer profile fulfill the legal requirements?   detailed info 

14%
average 55%
Check Result
Is the buyers website consistent with central procurement registry? 32% (contracts)
Are there obvious flaws or inconsistencies within the data? 0.74 (average mistakes per contract)
Are small scale tenders published on a buyer profile? (Compared to quantity of 34 tenders under the law)
0-250K 0 tenders
250K-500K 0 tenders
500K-1000K 0 tenders
1000K+ 0 tenders