Small cities • 2016

Město Hořovice

IČO 00233242

Procurement jounal notices do not contain many mistakes. Small number of firms does not recieve majority of contracts.

129.
ranking
72%
zIndex

Bidder participation

Is the level of competition satisfactory?   detailed info 

59%
average 59%
Largest contracts
Industry
Bids
Obnova, správa, provoz a údržba veřejného a slavnostního osvětlení, městských hodin a světelného signalizačního zařízení v Hořovicích
Údržba pouličního osvětlení
3
Ø4 in industry
Zateplení objektů 1. základní školy v Hořovicích včetně výměny oken - pavilony 1,2,4,5,6.
Stavební úpravy školních budov
6
Ø5 in industry
"Stavební úpravy víceúčelového hřiště v Hořovicích"
Stavební úpravy sportovních zařízení
4
Ø4 in industry
Přístupová komunikace ke společenskému domu a sportovnímu areálu
Stavební úpravy při rekonstrukci mostů
6
Ø5 in industry
Konsolidace IT a nové služby TC ORP Hořovice
Informační systémy a servery
3
Ø2 in industry

Winner concentration

Isn't majority of contracts awarded to small circle of firms?   detailed info 

68%
average 51%
Largest suppliers Contracts count Contracts volume Kč
Eltodo-citelum, s.r.o.
1 26,721,480
Miras - stavitelství a sanace s.r.o.
1 19,248,159
Envos, s.r.o.
1 16,466,369
Skanska a.s.
1 7,592,141
Autocont Cz a.s.
1 6,672,490
Other suppliers 10 16,424,882

Pro-competitive tools

Does the buyer foster the competition by using the available tools?   detailed info 

79%
average 64%
Tool Contracts count
Extended deadlines 0% (0 from 0)
Nonprice competition 0% (0 from 3)
Division into lots 0% (0 from 3)
E-auction 0% (0 from 3)
Innovative procedure 0% ( from 3)

Competitive contracting

How often does buyer use non-competitive procedures?   detailed info 

74%
average 84%
Contract
Reason for negotiated procedure without publication
Original contract (Kč) Contract modification / NPWP (Kč)
Konsolidace IT a nové služby TC ORP Hořovice
Předchozí zakázka bez nabídek, Předchozí zakázka bez nabídek
- 6,672,490

Consistent conduct

Does buyer discourage bidders by frequent competition cancellations or modifications?   detailed info 

60%
average 69%
Type of flaw Result
Issued tenders without published result 17%
Cancelled contracts 20%
Average requirements modifications count 0

Journal data quality

Does buyer publish vital data in official journal?   detailed info 

97%
average 80%
Type of flaw Contracts count
Bidders count not published 0% (0 from 15)
Final or estimated price not published 20% (3 from 15)
Procedure type not published 0% (0 from 15)
Missing supplier ID 0% (0 from 15)
Missing buyer ID 0% (0 from 15)
Wrong buyer name 0% (0 from 15)
Missing call for tenders 0% (0 from 15)
Missing winning price 0% ( from 15)
Contract modification by more than 50 % 0% ( from 15)

Supplier rating

Do the risky firms win frequently?   detailed info 

79%
average 85%
Type of flaw Contracts count
Supplier founded less than 180 days before contract award 0% (0 from 15)
Supplier with over 75 % of turnover from public procurement 7% (1 from 15)
Subcontractor share above 50 % 0% (0 from 15)
Supplier demise shortly after contract 0% (0 from 15)
Supplier bankruptcy 0% (0 from 15)
Supplier donating to political party 7% (1 from 15)
Supplier did not publish financial results on time 20% (3 from 15)