Small cities • 2016

Město Přibyslav

IČO 00268097

Uncompetitive procedures are overused.

Bidder participation

Is the level of competition satisfactory?   detailed info 

41%
average 59%
Largest contracts
Industry
Bids
Rekonstrukce a dostavba ZŠ Přibyslav - 3.etapa
Výstavba základních škol
5
Ø5 in industry
Modernizace a rozšíření ZŠ Přibyslav
Stavební úpravy školních budov
3
Ø5 in industry
Rekonstrukce komunikace v ulici Na Vyhlídce a Filipova, Přibyslav
Stavební úpravy pro komunikace
7
Ø5 in industry
REKULTIVACE SKLÁDKY S-OO3 RONOV NAD SÁZAVOU – PLOCHA č. 4
Výstavba skládek odpadů
8
Ø5 in industry
Rekonstrukce a dostavba ZŠ Přibyslav - jednací řízení bez uveřejnění
Stavební úpravy školních budov
1
Ø5 in industry

Winner concentration

Isn't majority of contracts awarded to small circle of firms?   detailed info 

54%
average 51%
Largest suppliers Contracts count Contracts volume Kč
Metrostav a.s.
7 46,190,392
Unistav a.s.
7 36,714,402
Lubomír Dvořák
2 9,101,864
Enviro - Ekoanalytika, s.r.o.
1 5,399,992
Česká spořitelna, a.s.
1 3,708,703
Other suppliers 10 15,439,223

Pro-competitive tools

Does the buyer foster the competition by using the available tools?   detailed info 

61%
average 64%
Tool Contracts count
Extended deadlines 67% (2 from 3)
Nonprice competition 0% (0 from 3)
Lots 0% (0 from 3)
E-auction 0% (0 from 3)

Competitive contracting

How often does buyer use non-competitive procedures?   detailed info 

49%
average 84%

Consistent conduct

Does buyer discourage bidders by frequent competition cancellations or modifications?   detailed info 

92%
average 69%
Type of flaw Result
Issued calls without published result 0%
Cancelled contracts 0%
Average requirements modifications count 0.33

Journal data quality

Does buyer publish vital data in official journal?   detailed info 

88%
average 80%
Type of flaw Contracts count
Bidders count not published 7% (2 from 30)
Final or estimated price not published 80% (24 from 30)
Procedure type not published 0% (0 from 30)
Missing supplier ID 3% (1 from 30)
Missing buyer ID 0% (0 from 30)
Wrong buyer name 0% (0 from 30)
Call and award notices contradict each other 0% (0 from 30)
Missing call for tenders 7% (2 from 30)

Supplier rating

Do the risky firms win frequently?   detailed info 

97%
average 85%
Type of flaw Contracts count
Supplier founded less than 180 days before contract award 0% (0 from 30)
Supplier with over 75 % of turnover from public procurement 0% (0 from 30)
Subcontractor share above 50 % 0% (0 from 30)
Supplier demise shortly after contract 0% (0 from 30)
Supplier bankruptcy 0% (0 from 30)
Supplier donating to political party 3% (1 from 30)
Supplier did not publish financial results on time 10% (3 from 30)