Small cities • 2018 • past ranking

Město Přibyslav

IČO 00268097

Buyer profile lacks mandatory machine readability. Tender documentation is well prepared, thus there is no need to modify or cancel the procedure.

66.
ranking
70%
zIndex

Bidder participation

Is the level of competition satisfactory?   detailed info 

50%
average 49%
Largest contracts
Industry
Bids
Stavební úpravy družiny na ZUŠ Přibyslav

5
Ø5 in industry
Rekonstrukce komunikace v ulici Na Vyhlídce a Filipova, Přibyslav

7
Ø7 in industry
Technická infrastruktura pro 16 RD Pod Osivou v Přibyslavi
Construction work for highways, roads
9
Ø7 in industry
Rekonstrukce ul. Zahradní a Rekonstrukce ul. Komenského, Přibyslav
Construction work for highways, roads
5
Ø7 in industry
Stavební práce "Přibyslav 2016"

3
Ø7 in industry

Winner concentration

Isn't majority of contracts awarded to small circle of firms?   detailed info 

75%
average 55%
Largest suppliers Contracts count Contracts volume Kč
EMH stavební CZ s.r.o.
4 10,055,737
Lubomír Dvořák
2 9,101,865
VHST s.r.o.
1 8,111,171
EUROVIA CS, a.s.
1 4,487,191
STRABAG a.s.
2 3,143,990
Other suppliers 8 13,448,805

Pro-competitive tools

Does the buyer foster the competition by using the available tools?   detailed info 

71%
average 59%
Tool Contracts count
Extended deadlines 67% (2 from 3)
Nonprice competition 0% (0 from 3)
Division into lots 33% (1 from 3)
E-auction 0% (0 from 3)
Innovative procedure 0% ( from 3)

Public procurement share on total purchases

What fraction of purchases was made under procurement law?   detailed info 

64%
average 66%
Purchases Volume (Kč)
Public procurement 147,276,731
Small scale tenders 0
Unregulated purchases 214,693,861
Total 361,970,592

Competitive contracting

How often does buyer use non-competitive procedures?   detailed info 

77%
average 91%

Consistent conduct

Does buyer discourage bidders by frequent competition cancellations or modifications?   detailed info 

100%
average 77%
Type of flaw Result
Issued tenders without published result 0%
Cancelled contracts 0%
Average requirements modifications count 0

Journal data quality

Does buyer publish vital data in official journal?   detailed info 

89%
average 91%
Type of flaw Contracts count
Bidders count not published 7% (1 from 15)
Final or estimated price not published 27% (4 from 15)
Procedure type not published 0% (0 from 15)
Missing supplier ID 13% (2 from 15)
Missing buyer ID 7% (1 from 15)
Wrong buyer name 0% (0 from 15)
Missing call for tenders 0% (0 from 15)
Missing winning price 0% ( from 15)
Contract modification by more than 50 % 0% ( from 15)

Buyer profile data quality

Does the buyer profile fulfill the legal requirements?   detailed info 

5%
average 38%
Check Result
Is the buyers website consistent with central procurement registry? 29% (contracts)
Are there obvious flaws or inconsistencies within the data? 0.93 (average mistakes per contract)
Are small scale tenders published on a buyer profile? (Compared to quantity of 14 tenders under the law)
0-250K 0 tenders
250K-500K 0 tenders
500K-1000K 0 tenders
1000K+ 0 tenders