Large cities • 2016

Město Žďár nad Sázavou

IČO 00295841

Good buyer. Buyer does not modify or cancel tenders which fosters competition. Buyer recieves unusually small ammount of bids.

9.
ranking
76%
zIndex

Bidder participation

Is the level of competition satisfactory?   detailed info 

44%
average 63%

Winner concentration

Isn't majority of contracts awarded to small circle of firms?   detailed info 

71%
average 76%
Largest suppliers Contracts count Contracts volume (Kč)
Pks stavby a.s.
1 34,880,634
Gremis, s.r.o.
4 34,860,735
Psk Group, spol. s r.o.
2 29,416,871
Habau Cz s.r.o.
1 24,617,748
Colas Cz, a.s.
1 7,398,620
Other suppliers 12 29,924,401

Pro-competitive tools

Does the buyer foster the competition by using the available tools?   detailed info 

61%
average 70%

Public procurement share on total purchases

What fraction of purchases was made under procurement law?   detailed info 

64%
average 57%
Purchases Volume (Kč)
Public procurement 161,117,310
Unregulated purchases 226,859,261
Total 387,976,571

Competitive contracting

How often does buyer use non-competitive procedures?   detailed info 

94%
average 77%
Contract
Reason for negotiated procedure without publication
Price (Kč)
Rekonstrukce povrchů náměstí Republiky ve Žďáru nad Sázavou
Dodatečné práce
2,654,215

Consistent conduct

Does buyer discourage bidders by frequent competition cancellations or modifications?   detailed info 

93%
average 65%
Type of flaw Result
Issued calls without published result 0%
Cancelled contracts 0%
Average requirements modifications count 0.29

Journal data quality

Does buyer publish vital data in official journal?   detailed info 

93%
average 83%
Type of flaw Contracts count
Bidders count not published 5% (1 from 21)
Final or estimated price not published 5% (1 from 21)
Procedure type not published 0% (0 from 21)
Missing supplier ID 5% (1 from 21)
Missing buyer ID 0% (0 from 21)
Wrong buyer name 0% (0 from 21)
Call and award notices contradict each other 0% (0 from 21)
Missing call for tenders 5% (1 from 21)

Buyer profile data quality

Does the buyer profile fulfill the legal requirements?   detailed info 

41%
average 46%
Check Result
Is the buyers website consistent with central procurement registry? 46% (contracts)
Are there obvious flaws or inconsistencies within the data? 0.42 (average mistakes per contract)

Supplier rating

Do the risky firms win frequently?   detailed info 

94%
average 84%
Type of flaw Contracts count
Supplier founded less than 180 days before contract award 0% (0 from 21)
Supplier with over 75 % of turnover from public procurement 0% (0 from 21)
Subcontractor share above 50 % 0% (0 from 21)
Supplier demise shortly after contract 0% (0 from 21)
Supplier bankruptcy 0% (0 from 21)
Supplier donating to political party 0% (0 from 21)
Supplier did not publish financial results on time 24% (5 from 21)