Large cities • 2018 • past ranking

Město Žďár nad Sázavou

IČO 00295841

Good buyer. Data on buyer profile have relatively good quality. Buyer divides contracts into lots to foster participation of SME's

4.
ranking
81%
zIndex

Bidder participation

Is the level of competition satisfactory?   detailed info 

51%
average 52%
Largest contracts
Industry
Bids
Obytný soubor Klafar III - část C1, Žďár nad Sázavou
Stavební úpravy pro komunikace
9
Ø7 in industry
Realizace energetických úspor na budově divadla ve Žďáře nad Sázavou
Stavební práce
10
Ø5 in industry
Správa, provozování a údržba veřejných pohřebišť města Žďár nad Sázavou
Různé služby
1
Ø2 in industry
Rekonstrukce Smetanovy ulice ve Žďáru nad Sázavou
Stavební úpravy pro komunikace
6
Ø7 in industry
„Rekonstrukce vnitřních prostor Kina Vysočina, 1. etapa“, Žďár nad Sázavou
Stavební úpravy uměleckých a kulturních budov
3
Ø4 in industry

Winner concentration

Isn't majority of contracts awarded to small circle of firms?   detailed info 

79%
average 70%
Largest suppliers Contracts count Contracts volume Kč
COLAS CZ, a.s.
3 24,423,620
GREMIS, s.r.o.
4 23,894,197
1. Žďárská plynařská a vodařská, a.s.
1 19,999,865
PSK Group, spol. s r.o.
1 13,930,820
Sedlák - Santa G., s.r.o.
1 13,530,720
Other suppliers 11 48,548,604

Public procurement share on total purchases

What fraction of purchases was made under procurement law?   detailed info 

55%
average 56%
Purchases Volume (Kč)
Public procurement 251,733,667
Unregulated purchases 592,491,953
Total 844,225,620

Competitive contracting

How often does buyer use non-competitive procedures?   detailed info 

93%
average 87%
Contract
Reason for negotiated procedure without publication
Price (Kč)
Rekonstrukce povrchů náměstí Republiky ve Žďáru nad Sázavou
Additional works , Outside directive scope
2,654,215

Journal data quality

Does buyer publish vital data in official journal?   detailed info 

94%
average 90%
Type of flaw Contracts count
Bidders count not published 0% (0 from 22)
Final or estimated price not published 0% (0 from 22)
Procedure type not published 0% (0 from 22)
Missing supplier ID 0% (0 from 22)
Missing buyer ID 5% (1 from 22)
Wrong buyer name 0% (0 from 22)
Call and award notices contradict each other 0% (0 from 22)
Missing call for tenders 5% (1 from 22)

Buyer profile data quality

Does the buyer profile fulfill the legal requirements?   detailed info 

82%
average 55%
Check Result
Is the buyers website consistent with central procurement registry? 89% (contracts)
Are there obvious flaws or inconsistencies within the data? 0.32 (average mistakes per contract)