City parts • 2016

Městská část Praha 10

IČO 00063941

Uncompetitive procedures are overused. Small number of firms does not recieve majority of contracts.

6.
ranking
72%
zIndex

Bidder participation

Is the level of competition satisfactory?   detailed info 

44%
average 53%

Winner concentration

Isn't majority of contracts awarded to small circle of firms?   detailed info 

84%
average 63%
Largest suppliers Contracts count Contracts volume Kč
Rossy service a.s.
2 26,533,439
Syner, s.r.o.
2 26,097,889
Izolpartner s.r.o.
2 25,836,374
Kooperativa pojišťovna, a.s., Vienna Insurance Group
1 15,648,588
Swietelsky stavební s.r.o.
1 10,995,108
Other suppliers 21 86,413,693

Competitive contracting

How often does buyer use non-competitive procedures?   detailed info 

44%
average 81%
Contract
Reason for negotiated procedure without publication
Original contract (Kč) Contract modification / NPWP (Kč)
Dodatečné stavební práce č. 3 - Rekonstrukce a dostavba areálu Vršovického zámečku
Krajní naléhavost
- 18,490,998
Dodatečné stavební práce č. 4 - Rekonstrukce a dostavba areálu Vršovického zámečku
Not disclosed
- 7,606,891
Komplexní outsourcing ICT ÚMČ Praha 10 po přechodnou dobu srpen – prosinec 2015
Krajní naléhavost
- 6,651,515
„Dodatečné stavební práce – Revitalizace parku Malešice“
Not disclosed
- 3,124,028

Consistent conduct

Does buyer discourage bidders by frequent competition cancellations or modifications?   detailed info 

55%
average 67%
Type of flaw Result
Issued tenders without published result 11%
Cancelled contracts 25%
Average requirements modifications count 0.81

Journal data quality

Does buyer publish vital data in official journal?   detailed info 

100%
average 88%
Type of flaw Contracts count
Bidders count not published 0% (0 from 29)
Final or estimated price not published 0% (0 from 29)
Procedure type not published 0% (0 from 29)
Missing supplier ID 0% (0 from 29)
Missing buyer ID 0% (0 from 29)
Wrong buyer name 0% (0 from 29)
Missing call for tenders 0% (0 from 29)
Missing winning price 0% ( from 29)
Contract modification by more than 50 % 0% ( from 29)

Supplier rating

Do the risky firms win frequently?   detailed info 

81%
average 85%
Type of flaw Contracts count
Supplier founded less than 180 days before contract award 0% (0 from 29)
Supplier with over 75 % of turnover from public procurement 0% (0 from 29)
Subcontractor share above 50 % 7% (2 from 29)
Supplier demise shortly after contract 0% (0 from 29)
Supplier bankruptcy 0% (0 from 29)
Supplier donating to political party 0% (0 from 29)
Supplier did not publish financial results on time 31% (9 from 29)