City parts • 2018 • past ranking

Městská část Praha 10

IČO 00063941

Buyer profile is in relatively good shape. Buyer has seriously violated procurement law.

Bidder participation

Is the level of competition satisfactory?   detailed info 

46%
average 42%

Winner concentration

Isn't majority of contracts awarded to small circle of firms?   detailed info 

76%
average 63%
Largest suppliers Contracts count Contracts volume Kč
DEREZA, společnost s ručením omezeným
1 38,100,225
Medifin s.r.o.
1 37,996,000
MARHOLD a.s.
1 20,897,613
S u b t e r r a a.s.
1 14,319,995
RENASTAV s.r.o.
1 8,492,867
Other suppliers 11 57,389,456

Pro-competitive tools

Does the buyer foster the competition by using the available tools?   detailed info 

58%
average 65%
Tool Contracts count
Extended deadlines 0% (0 from 14)
Nonprice competition 50% (11 from 22)
Division into lots 9% (2 from 22)
E-auction 0% (0 from 22)
Innovative procedure 0% ( from 22)

Competitive contracting

How often does buyer use non-competitive procedures?   detailed info 

86%
average 88%
Contract
Reason for negotiated procedure without publication
Original contract (Kč) Contract modification / NPWP (Kč)
Komplexní outsourcing ICT ÚMČ Praha 10 po přechodnou dobu srpen – prosinec 2015
Emergency
- 6,651,515

Consistent conduct

Does buyer discourage bidders by frequent competition cancellations or modifications?   detailed info 

42%
average 76%
Type of flaw Result
Issued tenders without published result 14%
Cancelled contracts 36%
Average requirements modifications count 1.05

Journal data quality

Does buyer publish vital data in official journal?   detailed info 

91%
average 89%
Type of flaw Contracts count
Bidders count not published 3% (1 from 33)
Final or estimated price not published 12% (4 from 33)
Procedure type not published 0% (0 from 33)
Missing supplier ID 0% (0 from 33)
Missing buyer ID 0% (0 from 33)
Wrong buyer name 0% (0 from 33)
Missing call for tenders 0% (0 from 33)
Missing winning price 0% ( from 33)
Contract modification by more than 50 % 0% ( from 33)

Buyer profile data quality

Does the buyer profile fulfill the legal requirements?   detailed info 

90%
average 33%
Check Result
Is the buyers website consistent with central procurement registry? 100% (contracts)
Are there obvious flaws or inconsistencies within the data? 0.38 (average mistakes per contract)
Are small scale tenders published on a buyer profile? (Compared to quantity of 21 tenders under the law)
0-250K 0 tenders
250K-500K 0 tenders
500K-1000K 0 tenders
1000K+ 0 tenders