City parts • 2016

Městská část Praha 1

IČO 00063410

Applicants are discouraged by frequent competition modifications and cancellations. The competition for contracts is low.

Bidder participation

Is the level of competition satisfactory?   detailed info 

39%
average 53%

Winner concentration

Isn't majority of contracts awarded to small circle of firms?   detailed info 

52%
average 63%
Largest suppliers Contracts count Contracts volume Kč
Bau plus, a.s.
2 202,006,353
Pp 53, a.s.
1 182,907,529
Swietelsky stavební s.r.o.
1 79,900,872
Eltodo, a.s.
1 10,490,406
Kh servis a.s.
1 10,443,700
Other suppliers 12 57,197,931

Pro-competitive tools

Does the buyer foster the competition by using the available tools?   detailed info 

50%
average 62%
Tool Contracts count
Extended deadlines 0% (0 from 3)
Nonprice competition 33% (1 from 3)
Lots 0% (0 from 3)
E-auction 0% (0 from 3)

Competitive contracting

How often does buyer use non-competitive procedures?   detailed info 

83%
average 81%
Contract
Reason for negotiated procedure without publication
Price (Kč)
Modernizace kamerových stanovišť Městského kamerového systému hlavního města Prahy na území Městské části Praha 1 - instalace, implementace a zprovoznění
Jediný dodavatel (právní důvody), Dodatečné práce
10,443,700
Realizace projektu přechodu z ES SAP na GINIS® Enterprise
Jediný dodavatel (právní důvody)
8,423,200
Záchranný archeologický výzkum v k.ú. Nové Město
Předchozí zakázka bez nabídek
5,493,560

Consistent conduct

Does buyer discourage bidders by frequent competition cancellations or modifications?   detailed info 

50%
average 67%
Type of flaw Result
Issued calls without published result 29%
Cancelled contracts 0%
Average requirements modifications count 2.20

Journal data quality

Does buyer publish vital data in official journal?   detailed info 

89%
average 88%
Type of flaw Contracts count
Bidders count not published 0% (0 from 18)
Final or estimated price not published 11% (2 from 18)
Procedure type not published 0% (0 from 18)
Missing supplier ID 0% (0 from 18)
Missing buyer ID 0% (0 from 18)
Wrong buyer name 0% (0 from 18)
Call and award notices contradict each other 0% (0 from 18)
Missing call for tenders 33% (6 from 18)

Supplier rating

Do the risky firms win frequently?   detailed info 

84%
average 85%
Type of flaw Contracts count
Supplier founded less than 180 days before contract award 0% (0 from 18)
Supplier with over 75 % of turnover from public procurement 0% (0 from 18)
Subcontractor share above 50 % 11% (2 from 18)
Supplier demise shortly after contract 0% (0 from 18)
Supplier bankruptcy 0% (0 from 18)
Supplier donating to political party 17% (3 from 18)
Supplier did not publish financial results on time 22% (4 from 18)