Small cities • 2018 • past ranking

Město Bystřice nad Pernštejnem

IČO 00294136

The competition for contracts is high. Applicants are discouraged by frequent competition modifications and cancellations.

58.
ranking
71%
zIndex

Bidder participation

Is the level of competition satisfactory?   detailed info 

77%
average 49%

Winner concentration

Isn't majority of contracts awarded to small circle of firms?   detailed info 

61%
average 55%
Largest suppliers Contracts count Contracts volume Kč
BD Č.P. 953-954: LUPOMĚCH – KONTEST
5 41,771,344
TS města a.s.
3 24,135,737
STRABAG a.s.
1 17,833,647
STAREDO s.r.o.
1 10,974,148
FiberTech s.r.o.
2 9,448,982
Other suppliers 3 11,926,931

Pro-competitive tools

Does the buyer foster the competition by using the available tools?   detailed info 

50%
average 59%
Tool Contracts count
Extended deadlines 0% (0 from 3)
Nonprice competition 0% (0 from 3)
Division into lots 67% (2 from 3)
E-auction 0% (0 from 3)
Innovative procedure 0% ( from 3)

Public procurement share on total purchases

What fraction of purchases was made under procurement law?   detailed info 

57%
average 66%
Purchases Volume (Kč)
Public procurement 328,280,713
Small scale tenders 0
Unregulated purchases 671,667,424
Total 999,948,138

Competitive contracting

How often does buyer use non-competitive procedures?   detailed info 

100%
average 91%
No contracts in negotiated procedure without publication.

Consistent conduct

Does buyer discourage bidders by frequent competition cancellations or modifications?   detailed info 

67%
average 77%
Type of flaw Result
Issued tenders without published result 0%
Cancelled contracts 0%
Average requirements modifications count 2.00

Journal data quality

Does buyer publish vital data in official journal?   detailed info 

92%
average 91%
Type of flaw Contracts count
Bidders count not published 0% (0 from 7)
Final or estimated price not published 14% (1 from 7)
Procedure type not published 0% (0 from 7)
Missing supplier ID 14% (1 from 7)
Missing buyer ID 0% (0 from 7)
Wrong buyer name 14% (1 from 7)
Missing call for tenders 29% (2 from 7)
Missing winning price 0% ( from 7)
Contract modification by more than 50 % 0% ( from 7)

Buyer profile data quality

Does the buyer profile fulfill the legal requirements?   detailed info 

39%
average 38%
Check Result
Is the buyers website consistent with central procurement registry? 100% (contracts)
Are there obvious flaws or inconsistencies within the data? 2.43 (average mistakes per contract)
Are small scale tenders published on a buyer profile? (Compared to quantity of 7 tenders under the law)
0-250K 0 tenders
250K-500K 0 tenders
500K-1000K 0 tenders
1000K+ 0 tenders