Small cities • 2016

Město Hranice

IČO 00301311

Small number of firms does not recieve majority of contracts. The competition for contracts is high.

144.
ranking
71%
zIndex

Bidder participation

Is the level of competition satisfactory?   detailed info 

76%
average 59%
Largest contracts
Industry
Bids
Hranice – Výstavba a rekonstrukce kanalizace v Hranicích
Stavební práce pro vodovodní a kanalizační potrubí
12
Ø5 in industry
Rekonstrukce zámecké zahrady
Stavební práce
4
Ø5 in industry
Rekonstrukce ulice Skalní - 1.etapa
Stavební práce
15
Ø5 in industry
Regenerace panelového sídliště Galašova a Na Hrázi III. etapa
Stavební práce
12
Ø5 in industry
Modernizace Domova seniorů v Hranicích
Stavební práce
6
Ø5 in industry

Winner concentration

Isn't majority of contracts awarded to small circle of firms?   detailed info 

82%
average 51%
Largest suppliers Contracts count Contracts volume Kč
Talpa - Rpf, s.r.o.
3 36,583,821
Strabag a.s.
7 30,963,356
Teplotechna Ostrava a.s.
9 27,921,662
Pss Přerovská stavební a.s.
12 23,068,520
Strojeastavby Tvrdoň, s.r.o.
3 15,357,405
Other suppliers 32 81,841,588

Competitive contracting

How often does buyer use non-competitive procedures?   detailed info 

75%
average 84%
Contract
Reason for negotiated procedure without publication
Price (Kč)
Hasičská zbrojnice – Velká
Not disclosed
3,987,650
Udržitelnost projektu Čisté ovzduší pro Moravskou bránu
Not disclosed
1,983,150
Zpracování digitálního povodňového plánu a rozšíření varovného a informačního systému obyvatelstva ORP Hranice
Not disclosed
1,889,713
Výsadba a ošetření zeleně v Hranicích
Not disclosed
1,367,797
Digitalizace letního kina
Not disclosed
1,350,000

Consistent conduct

Does buyer discourage bidders by frequent competition cancellations or modifications?   detailed info 

58%
average 69%
Type of flaw Result
Issued calls without published result 6%
Cancelled contracts 19%
Average requirements modifications count 0.81

Journal data quality

Does buyer publish vital data in official journal?   detailed info 

83%
average 80%
Type of flaw Contracts count
Bidders count not published 11% (7 from 66)
Final or estimated price not published 41% (27 from 66)
Procedure type not published 0% (0 from 66)
Missing supplier ID 9% (6 from 66)
Missing buyer ID 0% (0 from 66)
Wrong buyer name 0% (0 from 66)
Call and award notices contradict each other 2% (1 from 66)
Missing call for tenders 3% (2 from 66)

Supplier rating

Do the risky firms win frequently?   detailed info 

99%
average 85%
Type of flaw Contracts count
Supplier founded less than 180 days before contract award 0% (0 from 66)
Supplier with over 75 % of turnover from public procurement 0% (0 from 66)
Subcontractor share above 50 % 0% (0 from 66)
Supplier demise shortly after contract 0% (0 from 66)
Supplier bankruptcy 0% (0 from 66)
Supplier donating to political party 2% (1 from 66)
Supplier did not publish financial results on time 8% (5 from 66)