Large cities • 2016

Statutární město Frýdek-Místek

IČO 00296643

Large volume of money is spent without open competition. Court found no legal misconduct.

Bidder participation

Is the level of competition satisfactory?   detailed info 

51%
average 63%

Winner concentration

Isn't majority of contracts awarded to small circle of firms?   detailed info 

66%
average 76%
Largest suppliers Contracts count Contracts volume Kč
Porr a.s.
18 159,557,854
První Key - Stav, a.s.
6 30,919,368
Beskydská stavební, a.s.
4 26,102,304
Čez Prodej, s.r.o.
1 21,124,987
Bdstav Morava s.r.o.
2 20,695,672
Other suppliers 51 135,273,846

Pro-competitive tools

Does the buyer foster the competition by using the available tools?   detailed info 

84%
average 70%
Tool Contracts count
Extended deadlines 14% (3 from 22)
Nonprice competition 0% (0 from 22)
Lots 45% (10 from 22)
E-auction 27% (6 from 22)
Inovativni 0% ( from 22)

Public procurement share on total purchases

What fraction of purchases was made under procurement law?   detailed info 

52%
average 57%
Purchases Volume (Kč)
Public procurement 395,917,398
Zakazky maleho rozsahu 0
Unregulated purchases 1,066,889,727
Total 1,462,807,125

Competitive contracting

How often does buyer use non-competitive procedures?   detailed info 

16%
average 77%

Consistent conduct

Does buyer discourage bidders by frequent competition cancellations or modifications?   detailed info 

56%
average 65%
Type of flaw Result
Issued calls without published result 0%
Cancelled contracts 29%
Average requirements modifications count 0.42

Journal data quality

Does buyer publish vital data in official journal?   detailed info 

77%
average 83%
Type of flaw Contracts count
Bidders count not published 16% (13 from 82)
Final or estimated price not published 51% (42 from 82)
Procedure type not published 0% (0 from 82)
Missing supplier ID 4% (3 from 82)
Missing buyer ID 0% (0 from 82)
Wrong buyer name 0% (0 from 82)
Missing call for tenders 1% (1 from 82)
Zakazka nema viteznou cenu 0% ( from 82)
Cena byla aktualizovana 0% ( from 82)

Buyer profile data quality

Does the buyer profile fulfill the legal requirements?   detailed info 

51%
average 46%
Check Result
Is the buyers website consistent with central procurement registry? 73% (contracts)
Are there obvious flaws or inconsistencies within the data? 1.22 (average mistakes per contract)
Uveřejňují se na profilu zakázky malého rozsahu? (Poměřujeme proti počtu zakázek v režimu zákona)
0-250K 0 zakázek
250K-500K 0 zakázek
500K-1000K 0 zakázek
1000K+ 0 zakázek

Supplier rating

Do the risky firms win frequently?   detailed info 

86%
average 84%
Type of flaw Contracts count
Supplier founded less than 180 days before contract award 1% (1 from 82)
Supplier with over 75 % of turnover from public procurement 2% (2 from 82)
Subcontractor share above 50 % 0% (0 from 82)
Supplier demise shortly after contract 0% (0 from 82)
Supplier bankruptcy 0% (0 from 82)
Supplier donating to political party 7% (6 from 82)
Supplier did not publish financial results on time 17% (14 from 82)