Large cities • 2016

Statutární město Prostějov

IČO 00288659

Good buyer. Buyer profile is in relatively good shape. Court deemed all complaints against buyer invalid or insignificant.

4.
ranking
78%
zIndex

Bidder participation

Is the level of competition satisfactory?   detailed info 

72%
average 63%

Winner concentration

Isn't majority of contracts awarded to small circle of firms?   detailed info 

86%
average 76%
Largest suppliers Contracts count Contracts volume (Kč)
Skanska a.s.
9 53,816,503
Pozemstav Prostějov,a.s.
9 37,478,172
E.on Energie, a.s.
2 29,033,728
Prostějovská stavební společnost-prostas, s.r.o.
2 24,774,396
H & B delta, s.r.o.
4 24,084,424
Other suppliers 49 160,977,855

Pro-competitive tools

Does the buyer foster the competition by using the available tools?   detailed info 

83%
average 70%
Tool Contracts count
Extended deadlines 68% (15 from 22)
Nonprice competition 82% (18 from 22)
Lots 45% (10 from 22)
E-auction 9% (2 from 22)

Public procurement share on total purchases

What fraction of purchases was made under procurement law?   detailed info 

44%
average 57%
Purchases Volume (Kč)
Public procurement 335,410,623
Unregulated purchases 1,359,779,356
Total 1,695,189,979

Competitive contracting

How often does buyer use non-competitive procedures?   detailed info 

81%
average 77%

Consistent conduct

Does buyer discourage bidders by frequent competition cancellations or modifications?   detailed info 

60%
average 65%
Type of flaw Result
Issued calls without published result 7%
Cancelled contracts 7%
Average requirements modifications count 1.10

Journal data quality

Does buyer publish vital data in official journal?   detailed info 

92%
average 83%
Type of flaw Contracts count
Bidders count not published 5% (4 from 75)
Final or estimated price not published 12% (9 from 75)
Procedure type not published 0% (0 from 75)
Missing supplier ID 5% (4 from 75)
Missing buyer ID 0% (0 from 75)
Wrong buyer name 0% (0 from 75)
Call and award notices contradict each other 0% (0 from 75)
Missing call for tenders 3% (2 from 75)

Buyer profile data quality

Does the buyer profile fulfill the legal requirements?   detailed info 

65%
average 46%
Check Result
Is the buyers website consistent with central procurement registry? 80% (contracts)
Are there obvious flaws or inconsistencies within the data? 0.77 (average mistakes per contract)

Supplier rating

Do the risky firms win frequently?   detailed info 

92%
average 84%
Type of flaw Contracts count
Supplier founded less than 180 days before contract award 0% (0 from 75)
Supplier with over 75 % of turnover from public procurement 0% (0 from 75)
Subcontractor share above 50 % 0% (0 from 75)
Supplier demise shortly after contract 0% (0 from 75)
Supplier bankruptcy 0% (0 from 75)
Supplier donating to political party 0% (0 from 75)
Supplier did not publish financial results on time 19% (14 from 75)