Large cities • 2016

Město Uherské Hradiště

IČO 00291471

Good buyer. Competitions are open to multiple bidders. Court found no legal misconduct.

9.
ranking
76%
zIndex

Bidder participation

Is the level of competition satisfactory?   detailed info 

55%
average 63%
Largest contracts
Industry
Bids
Zpřístupnění bývalého vojenského výcvikového prostoru Rochus v Uherském Hradišti
Stavební úpravy pro komunikace
4
Ø5 in industry
Převedení OV z MČ Vésky a Míkovice na ČOV Uherské Hradiště
Stavební práce na výstavbě kanalizačních sítí
5
Ø5 in industry
Revitalizace veřejných prostranství v centru města Uherské Hradiště
Stavební úpravy pro komunikace
5
Ø5 in industry
Revitalizace veřejných prostranství Pod Svahy
Stavební práce
8
Ø5 in industry
STAVEBNÍ ÚPRAVY DOMU č.p. 293, UHERSKÉ HRADIŠTĚ
Stavební úpravy domů
4
Ø4 in industry

Winner concentration

Isn't majority of contracts awarded to small circle of firms?   detailed info 

84%
average 76%
Largest suppliers Contracts count Contracts volume Kč
Strabag a.s.
3 34,620,027
Skanska a.s.
2 29,138,674
Vodohospodářské stavby Javorník-cz s.r.o.
1 21,410,076
E.on Energie, a.s.
3 19,481,138
H S K spol. s r.o.
2 16,360,169
Other suppliers 22 92,395,467

Public procurement share on total purchases

What fraction of purchases was made under procurement law?   detailed info 

52%
average 57%
Purchases Volume (Kč)
Public procurement 213,405,552
Small scale tenders 0
Unregulated purchases 577,161,611
Total 790,567,163

Competitive contracting

How often does buyer use non-competitive procedures?   detailed info 

100%
average 77%
No contracts in negotiated procedure without publication.

Consistent conduct

Does buyer discourage bidders by frequent competition cancellations or modifications?   detailed info 

78%
average 65%
Type of flaw Result
Issued tenders without published result 7%
Cancelled contracts 7%
Average requirements modifications count 0.41

Journal data quality

Does buyer publish vital data in official journal?   detailed info 

84%
average 83%
Type of flaw Contracts count
Bidders count not published 0% (0 from 33)
Final or estimated price not published 36% (12 from 33)
Procedure type not published 0% (0 from 33)
Missing supplier ID 0% (0 from 33)
Missing buyer ID 0% (0 from 33)
Wrong buyer name 0% (0 from 33)
Missing call for tenders 9% (3 from 33)
Missing winning price 0% ( from 33)
Contract modification by more than 50 % 0% ( from 33)

Buyer profile data quality

Does the buyer profile fulfill the legal requirements?   detailed info 

53%
average 46%
Check Result
Is the buyers website consistent with central procurement registry? 66% (contracts)
Are there obvious flaws or inconsistencies within the data? 0.75 (average mistakes per contract)
Are small scale tenders published on a buyer profile? (Compared to quantity of tenders under the law)
0-250K 0 tenders
250K-500K 0 tenders
500K-1000K 0 tenders
1000K+ 0 tenders

Supplier rating

Do the risky firms win frequently?   detailed info 

81%
average 84%
Type of flaw Contracts count
Supplier founded less than 180 days before contract award 0% (0 from 33)
Supplier with over 75 % of turnover from public procurement 0% (0 from 33)
Subcontractor share above 50 % 6% (2 from 33)
Supplier demise shortly after contract 0% (0 from 33)
Supplier bankruptcy 3% (1 from 33)
Supplier donating to political party 21% (7 from 33)
Supplier did not publish financial results on time 9% (3 from 33)