Large cities • 2018 • past ranking

Město Uherské Hradiště

IČO 00291471

Often makes mistakes in procurement journal announcements. Competitions are open to multiple bidders.

19.
ranking
75%
zIndex

Bidder participation

Is the level of competition satisfactory?   detailed info 

45%
average 52%
Largest contracts
Industry
Bids
Rekonstrukce ZUŠ Uherské Hradiště
Construction work for school buildings
11
Ø5 in industry
"Stavební úpravy objektu MŠ ZŠ Šafaříkova č.p. 961 Uherské Hradiště"
Construction work
1
Ø5 in industry
Stavební úpravy objektu MŠ ZŠ Šafaříkova č.p. 961 Uherské Hradiště
Construction work
1
Ø5 in industry
"Rekonstrukce domu č.p. 445, ul. Kollárova"
Construction work
2
Ø5 in industry
Revitalizace veřejných prostranství Pod Svahy

8
Ø5 in industry

Winner concentration

Isn't majority of contracts awarded to small circle of firms?   detailed info 

78%
average 70%
Largest suppliers Contracts count Contracts volume Kč
VW WACHAL a.s.
1 36,739,017
STAMOS Uherské Hradiště, spol. s r.o.
2 34,405,890
Porr a.s.
2 22,528,080
GSR s.r.o.
1 15,889,134
STRABAG a.s.
2 14,950,148
Other suppliers 12 57,525,579

Pro-competitive tools

Does the buyer foster the competition by using the available tools?   detailed info 

73%
average 71%
Tool Contracts count
Extended deadlines 25% (1 from 4)
Nonprice competition 14% (1 from 7)
Division into lots 14% (1 from 7)
E-auction 0% (0 from 7)
Innovative procedure 0% ( from 7)

Public procurement share on total purchases

What fraction of purchases was made under procurement law?   detailed info 

51%
average 56%
Purchases Volume (Kč)
Public procurement 334,490,482
Small scale tenders 0
Unregulated purchases 975,709,497
Total 1,310,199,978

Competitive contracting

How often does buyer use non-competitive procedures?   detailed info 

100%
average 87%
No contracts in negotiated procedure without publication.

Consistent conduct

Does buyer discourage bidders by frequent competition cancellations or modifications?   detailed info 

86%
average 77%

Journal data quality

Does buyer publish vital data in official journal?   detailed info 

77%
average 90%
Type of flaw Contracts count
Bidders count not published 9% (2 from 22)
Final or estimated price not published 36% (8 from 22)
Procedure type not published 0% (0 from 22)
Missing supplier ID 0% (0 from 22)
Missing buyer ID 14% (3 from 22)
Wrong buyer name 5% (1 from 22)
Missing call for tenders 5% (1 from 22)
Missing winning price 0% ( from 22)
Contract modification by more than 50 % 0% ( from 22)

Buyer profile data quality

Does the buyer profile fulfill the legal requirements?   detailed info 

62%
average 55%
Check Result
Is the buyers website consistent with central procurement registry? 82% (contracts)
Are there obvious flaws or inconsistencies within the data? 0.77 (average mistakes per contract)
Are small scale tenders published on a buyer profile? (Compared to quantity of 22 tenders under the law)
0-250K 0 tenders
250K-500K 0 tenders
500K-1000K 0 tenders
1000K+ 0 tenders