Small cities • 2016

Město Choceň

IČO 00278955

The competition for contracts is high. Uncompetitive procedures are overused.

157.
ranking
70%
zIndex

Bidder participation

Is the level of competition satisfactory?   detailed info 

79%
average 59%

Winner concentration

Isn't majority of contracts awarded to small circle of firms?   detailed info 

63%
average 51%
Largest suppliers Contracts count Contracts volume Kč
Pragoplyn, a.s.
4 33,911,343
P S K , s.r.o. Choceň
2 13,512,274
První Vysokomýtská stavební společnost s r.o.
2 11,699,654
Profistav Litomyšl, a.s.
3 8,947,123
Amper Market, a.s.
1 5,073,298
Other suppliers 8 15,948,048

Pro-competitive tools

Does the buyer foster the competition by using the available tools?   detailed info 

79%
average 64%
Tool Contracts count
Extended deadlines 33% (1 from 3)
Nonprice competition 0% (0 from 3)
Lots 0% (0 from 3)
E-auction 67% (2 from 3)

Competitive contracting

How often does buyer use non-competitive procedures?   detailed info 

65%
average 84%

Consistent conduct

Does buyer discourage bidders by frequent competition cancellations or modifications?   detailed info 

75%
average 69%
Type of flaw Result
Issued calls without published result 0%
Cancelled contracts 25%
Average requirements modifications count 0.25

Journal data quality

Does buyer publish vital data in official journal?   detailed info 

61%
average 80%
Type of flaw Contracts count
Bidders count not published 25% (5 from 20)
Final or estimated price not published 45% (9 from 20)
Procedure type not published 0% (0 from 20)
Missing supplier ID 5% (1 from 20)
Missing buyer ID 0% (0 from 20)
Wrong buyer name 0% (0 from 20)
Call and award notices contradict each other 0% (0 from 20)
Missing call for tenders 15% (3 from 20)

Supplier rating

Do the risky firms win frequently?   detailed info 

88%
average 85%
Type of flaw Contracts count
Supplier founded less than 180 days before contract award 0% (0 from 20)
Supplier with over 75 % of turnover from public procurement 0% (0 from 20)
Subcontractor share above 50 % 0% (0 from 20)
Supplier demise shortly after contract 0% (0 from 20)
Supplier bankruptcy 5% (1 from 20)
Supplier donating to political party 0% (0 from 20)
Supplier did not publish financial results on time 35% (7 from 20)