Small cities • 2018 • past ranking

Město Choceň

IČO 00278955

Uncompetitive procedures are overused. Buyer profile lacks mandatory machine readability.

Bidder participation

Is the level of competition satisfactory?   detailed info 

54%
average 49%

Winner concentration

Isn't majority of contracts awarded to small circle of firms?   detailed info 

75%
average 55%
Largest suppliers Contracts count Contracts volume Kč
EKOLA České Libchavy s.r.o.
1 21,745,925
Amper Market, a.s.
2 21,073,298
ALTERINVESTA CZ s.r.o.
1 19,754,265
AGILE spol. s r.o.
1 14,394,001
První Vysokomýtská stavební společnost s.r.o.
2 11,699,654
Other suppliers 8 31,834,691

Pro-competitive tools

Does the buyer foster the competition by using the available tools?   detailed info 

65%
average 59%

Public procurement share on total purchases

What fraction of purchases was made under procurement law?   detailed info 

74%
average 66%
Purchases Volume (Kč)
Public procurement 182,506,877
Small scale tenders 0
Unregulated purchases 148,916,940
Total 331,423,817

Competitive contracting

How often does buyer use non-competitive procedures?   detailed info 

49%
average 91%
Contract
Reason for negotiated procedure without publication
Original contract (Kč) Contract modification / NPWP (Kč)
Nástavba a přístavba MŠ Vostelčice, Choceň, Smetanova 1682
Outside directive scope
- 19,754,265
Dodatečné služby u akce: Ošetření památné aleje v Chocni v úseku od autobusového nádraží po ul. Pod Chlumem
Additional works
- 12,614
Dodatečné služby u akce: Regenerace zeleně Zámeckého parku v Chocni
Additional works
- 7,920

Journal data quality

Does buyer publish vital data in official journal?   detailed info 

83%
average 91%
Type of flaw Contracts count
Bidders count not published 7% (1 from 15)
Final or estimated price not published 20% (3 from 15)
Procedure type not published 0% (0 from 15)
Missing supplier ID 0% (0 from 15)
Missing buyer ID 0% (0 from 15)
Wrong buyer name 0% (0 from 15)
Missing call for tenders 13% (2 from 15)
Missing winning price 0% ( from 15)
Contract modification by more than 50 % 0% ( from 15)

Buyer profile data quality

Does the buyer profile fulfill the legal requirements?   detailed info 

0%
average 38%
Check Result
Is the buyers website consistent with central procurement registry? 40% (contracts)
Are there obvious flaws or inconsistencies within the data? 1.80 (average mistakes per contract)
Are small scale tenders published on a buyer profile? (Compared to quantity of 15 tenders under the law)
0-250K 0 tenders
250K-500K 0 tenders
500K-1000K 0 tenders
1000K+ 0 tenders