Small cities • 2016

Město Roudnice nad Labem

IČO 00264334

Applicants are discouraged by frequent competition modifications and cancellations. There are not many contract extensions and ammendments.

144.
ranking
71%
zIndex

Bidder participation

Is the level of competition satisfactory?   detailed info 

69%
average 59%
Largest contracts
Industry
Bids
„Dodavatel stavby Alej 17. Listopadu – moderní dopravní tepna“
Stavební práce
9
Ø5 in industry
DLOUHODOBÉ ZAJIŠTĚNÍ DOPRAVNÍ OBSLUŽNOSTI MĚSTA ROUDNICE NAD LABEM VEŘEJNÝMI SLUŽBAMI V PŘEPRAVĚ CESTUJÍCÍCH
Služby veřejné silniční dopravy
2
Ø3 in industry
Dodavatel stavebních prací Jungmannova 670 II.
Rekonstrukce budov
7
Ø5 in industry
Externí právní služby
Právní služby
neuveden
Ø4 in industry
Dodavatel stavebních prací Sladkovského 1365 II.
Rekonstrukce budov
5
Ø5 in industry

Winner concentration

Isn't majority of contracts awarded to small circle of firms?   detailed info 

59%
average 51%
Largest suppliers Contracts count Contracts volume (Kč)
Raeder & Falge s.r.o.
1 19,857,655
Arriva Praha s.r.o.
1 17,041,374
Arteso spol. s r.o.
2 14,193,783
Mgr. Robert Jaroš, advokát
1 6,485,672
Farní charita Roudnice nad Labem
1 4,558,779
Other suppliers 1 1,948,550

Pro-competitive tools

Does the buyer foster the competition by using the available tools?   detailed info 

65%
average 64%

Competitive contracting

How often does buyer use non-competitive procedures?   detailed info 

100%
average 84%
No contracts in negotiated procedure without publication.

Consistent conduct

Does buyer discourage bidders by frequent competition cancellations or modifications?   detailed info 

48%
average 69%
Type of flaw Result
Issued calls without published result 0%
Cancelled contracts 50%
Average requirements modifications count 0.27

Journal data quality

Does buyer publish vital data in official journal?   detailed info 

87%
average 80%
Type of flaw Contracts count
Bidders count not published 14% (1 from 7)
Final or estimated price not published 14% (1 from 7)
Procedure type not published 0% (0 from 7)
Missing supplier ID 0% (0 from 7)
Missing buyer ID 0% (0 from 7)
Wrong buyer name 0% (0 from 7)
Call and award notices contradict each other 14% (1 from 7)
Missing call for tenders 14% (1 from 7)

Supplier rating

Do the risky firms win frequently?   detailed info 

75%
average 85%
Type of flaw Contracts count
Supplier founded less than 180 days before contract award 0% (0 from 7)
Supplier with over 75 % of turnover from public procurement 0% (0 from 7)
Subcontractor share above 50 % 0% (0 from 7)
Supplier demise shortly after contract 0% (0 from 7)
Supplier bankruptcy 0% (0 from 7)
Supplier donating to political party 14% (1 from 7)
Supplier did not publish financial results on time 29% (2 from 7)