Small cities • 2018 • past ranking

Město Roudnice nad Labem

IČO 00264334

Buyer does not support competition by using e-auctions, lots or extended deadlines. Buyer profile lacks mandatory machine readability.

Bidder participation

Is the level of competition satisfactory?   detailed info 

22%
average 49%
Largest contracts
Industry
Bids
Rekonstrukce krytého plaveckého bazénu města Roudnice nad Labem
Stavební úpravy budov sloužících pro volný čas, sporty, kulturu, ubytování a restaurace
3
Ø4 in industry
Celoroční údržba veřejné zeleně ve městě Roudnice nad Labem
Zahradnické služby
3
Ø5 in industry
DLOUHODOBÉ ZAJIŠTĚNÍ DOPRAVNÍ OBSLUŽNOSTI MĚSTA ROUDNICE NAD LABEM VEŘEJNÝMI SLUŽBAMI V PŘEPRAVĚ CESTUJÍCÍCH
Služby veřejné silniční dopravy
2
Ø2 in industry
Pojištění majetku, pojištění odpovědnosti za škodu, pojištění vozidel a úrazové pojištění
Pojištění majetku
1
Ø2 in industry
Cisternová automobilová stříkačka pro JSDH Roudnice nad Labem
Cisternové automobilové stříkačky
1
Ø2 in industry

Winner concentration

Isn't majority of contracts awarded to small circle of firms?   detailed info 

55%
average 55%
Largest suppliers Contracts count Contracts volume Kč
Raeder & Falge s.r.o.
1 33,899,884
Pavel Veselka
1 18,000,000
ARRIVA PRAHA s.r.o.
1 17,041,374
Česká podnikatelská pojišťovna, a.s., Vienna Insurance Group
1 10,685,110
THT Polička, s.r.o.
1 5,898,000

Public procurement share on total purchases

What fraction of purchases was made under procurement law?   detailed info 

52%
average 66%
Purchases Volume (Kč)
Public procurement 132,568,807
Unregulated purchases 365,039,052
Total 497,607,859

Competitive contracting

How often does buyer use non-competitive procedures?   detailed info 

100%
average 91%
No contracts in negotiated procedure without publication.

Journal data quality

Does buyer publish vital data in official journal?   detailed info 

99%
average 91%
Type of flaw Contracts count
Bidders count not published 0% (0 from 7)
Final or estimated price not published 14% (1 from 7)
Procedure type not published 0% (0 from 7)
Missing supplier ID 0% (0 from 7)
Missing buyer ID 0% (0 from 7)
Wrong buyer name 0% (0 from 7)
Call and award notices contradict each other 0% (0 from 7)
Missing call for tenders 0% (0 from 7)

Buyer profile data quality

Does the buyer profile fulfill the legal requirements?   detailed info 

0%
average 38%
Check Result
Is the buyers website consistent with central procurement registry? 17% (contracts)
Are there obvious flaws or inconsistencies within the data? 1.33 (average mistakes per contract)