Large cities • 2016

Statutární město Chomutov

IČO 00261891

Buyer profile lacks mandatory machine readability. Calls for tenders are often modified or cancelled.

Bidder participation

Is the level of competition satisfactory?   detailed info 

82%
average 63%

Winner concentration

Isn't majority of contracts awarded to small circle of firms?   detailed info 

80%
average 76%
Largest suppliers Contracts count Contracts volume Kč
T-soft a.s.
2 83,600,000
Petrom Stavby, a.s.
4 47,839,627
Silnice Group a.s.
4 47,255,950
Gardenline s.r.o.
2 43,453,018
Frk s.r.o.
4 34,126,425
Other suppliers 29 132,679,033

Pro-competitive tools

Does the buyer foster the competition by using the available tools?   detailed info 

69%
average 70%
Tool Contracts count
Extended deadlines 0% (10 from 0)
Nonprice competition 28% (5 from 18)
Division into lots 11% (2 from 18)
E-auction 0% (0 from 18)
Innovative procedure 0% ( from 18)

Public procurement share on total purchases

What fraction of purchases was made under procurement law?   detailed info 

82%
average 57%
Purchases Volume (Kč)
Public procurement 398,228,114
Small scale tenders 0
Unregulated purchases 192,114,624
Total 590,342,738

Competitive contracting

How often does buyer use non-competitive procedures?   detailed info 

95%
average 77%

Consistent conduct

Does buyer discourage bidders by frequent competition cancellations or modifications?   detailed info 

32%
average 65%
Type of flaw Result
Issued tenders without published result 0%
Cancelled contracts 23%
Average requirements modifications count 2.04

Journal data quality

Does buyer publish vital data in official journal?   detailed info 

88%
average 83%
Type of flaw Contracts count
Bidders count not published 2% (1 from 46)
Final or estimated price not published 26% (12 from 46)
Procedure type not published 0% (0 from 46)
Missing supplier ID 0% (0 from 46)
Missing buyer ID 0% (0 from 46)
Wrong buyer name 0% (0 from 46)
Missing call for tenders 15% (7 from 46)
Missing winning price 0% ( from 46)
Contract modification by more than 50 % 0% ( from 46)

Buyer profile data quality

Does the buyer profile fulfill the legal requirements?   detailed info 

0%
average 46%
Check Result
Is the buyers website consistent with central procurement registry? 45% (contracts)
Are there obvious flaws or inconsistencies within the data? 0.00 (average mistakes per contract)
Are small scale tenders published on a buyer profile? (Compared to quantity of tenders under the law)
0-250K 0 tenders
250K-500K 0 tenders
500K-1000K 0 tenders
1000K+ 0 tenders

Supplier rating

Do the risky firms win frequently?   detailed info 

87%
average 84%
Type of flaw Contracts count
Supplier founded less than 180 days before contract award 0% (0 from 46)
Supplier with over 75 % of turnover from public procurement 0% (0 from 46)
Subcontractor share above 50 % 2% (1 from 46)
Supplier demise shortly after contract 0% (0 from 46)
Supplier bankruptcy 0% (0 from 46)
Supplier donating to political party 15% (7 from 46)
Supplier did not publish financial results on time 13% (6 from 46)