Large cities • 2016

Město Příbram

IČO 00243132

Buyer profile has high number of errors. Court deemed all complaints against buyer invalid or insignificant.

21.
ranking
74%
zIndex

Bidder participation

Is the level of competition satisfactory?   detailed info 

69%
average 63%
Largest contracts
Industry
Bids
Výběr zhotovitele stavebních prací – Rekonstrukce místních komunikací v Příbrami – 2. etapa
Stavební práce pro potrubní, telekomunikační a elektrické vedení, pro dálnice, silnice, přistávací plochy a železnice; zarovnávání ploch
6
Ø5 in industry
Výběr zhotovitele stavebních prací – Rekonstrukce ledových ploch na zimním stadionu v Příbrami
Stavební úpravy sportovních zařízení
2
Ø4 in industry
Výběr zhotovitele stavebních prací – Příbram - rekonstrukce a modernizace místních komunikací
Stavební práce pro potrubní, telekomunikační a elektrické vedení, pro dálnice, silnice, přistávací plochy a železnice; zarovnávání ploch
10
Ø5 in industry
Výběr zhotovitele stavebních prací – IPRM IV – rekonstrukce a revitalizace ulice 28. října a okolí v Příbrami VII
Stavební práce na městské výstavbě
7
Ø5 in industry
Výběr zhotovitele stavebních prací – Kompostárna a sběrný dvůr odpadů
Stavební práce
4
Ø5 in industry

Winner concentration

Isn't majority of contracts awarded to small circle of firms?   detailed info 

81%
average 76%
Largest suppliers Contracts count Contracts volume (Kč)
Bögl a Krýsl, k.s.
9 66,679,483
Strabag a.s.
5 51,773,819
Mtstav Příbram, s.r.o.
5 25,387,968
Kaver-chlazení, s.r.o.
2 23,642,124
Mnd a.s.
1 15,693,937
Other suppliers 37 125,943,941

Pro-competitive tools

Does the buyer foster the competition by using the available tools?   detailed info 

83%
average 70%
Tool Contracts count
Extended deadlines 42% (11 from 26)
Nonprice competition 4% (1 from 26)
Lots 62% (16 from 26)
E-auction 4% (1 from 26)

Public procurement share on total purchases

What fraction of purchases was made under procurement law?   detailed info 

62%
average 57%
Purchases Volume (Kč)
Public procurement 309,121,276
Unregulated purchases 492,155,115
Total 801,276,391

Competitive contracting

How often does buyer use non-competitive procedures?   detailed info 

65%
average 77%

Consistent conduct

Does buyer discourage bidders by frequent competition cancellations or modifications?   detailed info 

66%
average 65%
Type of flaw Result
Issued calls without published result 0%
Cancelled contracts 10%
Average requirements modifications count 0.69

Journal data quality

Does buyer publish vital data in official journal?   detailed info 

95%
average 83%
Type of flaw Contracts count
Bidders count not published 0% (0 from 60)
Final or estimated price not published 20% (12 from 60)
Procedure type not published 0% (0 from 60)
Missing supplier ID 2% (1 from 60)
Missing buyer ID 0% (0 from 60)
Wrong buyer name 0% (0 from 60)
Call and award notices contradict each other 0% (0 from 60)
Missing call for tenders 2% (1 from 60)

Buyer profile data quality

Does the buyer profile fulfill the legal requirements?   detailed info 

28%
average 46%
Check Result
Is the buyers website consistent with central procurement registry? 55% (contracts)
Are there obvious flaws or inconsistencies within the data? 1.97 (average mistakes per contract)

Supplier rating

Do the risky firms win frequently?   detailed info 

90%
average 84%
Type of flaw Contracts count
Supplier founded less than 180 days before contract award 0% (0 from 60)
Supplier with over 75 % of turnover from public procurement 0% (0 from 60)
Subcontractor share above 50 % 3% (2 from 60)
Supplier demise shortly after contract 0% (0 from 60)
Supplier bankruptcy 0% (0 from 60)
Supplier donating to political party 3% (2 from 60)
Supplier did not publish financial results on time 13% (8 from 60)