Small cities • 2016

Město Hlinsko

IČO 00270059

Uncompetitive procedures are overused. Tender documentation is well prepared, thus there is no need to modify or cancel the procedure.

Bidder participation

Is the level of competition satisfactory?   detailed info 

54%
average 59%
Largest contracts
Industry
Bids
Svoz odpadů ve městě Hlinsko
Služby související s likvidací odpadů a odpady
1
Ø3 in industry
Zateplení ZŠ Ležáků Hlinsko
Stavební úpravy školních budov
4
Ø5 in industry
Zateplení MŠ Rubešova Hlinsko
Stavební úpravy budov mateřských škol
15
Ø5 in industry
Zateplení MŠ Budovatelů, Hlinsko
Stavební úpravy školních budov
19
Ø5 in industry
Konsolidace technologické a aplikační architektury TC MÚ Hlinsko
Informační systémy a servery
2
Ø2 in industry

Winner concentration

Isn't majority of contracts awarded to small circle of firms?   detailed info 

62%
average 51%
Largest suppliers Contracts count Contracts volume Kč
Technické služby Hlinsko, s.r.o.
1 22,995,820
Stavební firma Libor Jindřichovský s.r.o.
1 16,264,924
Agile spol. s r.o.
1 7,288,665
Renos s.r.o.
1 7,080,504
Autocont Cz a.s.
1 6,119,000
Other suppliers 2 7,039,166

Pro-competitive tools

Does the buyer foster the competition by using the available tools?   detailed info 

61%
average 64%
Tool Contracts count
Extended deadlines 0% (3 from 0)
Nonprice competition 0% (0 from 5)
Division into lots 0% (0 from 5)
E-auction 0% (0 from 5)
Innovative procedure 0% ( from 5)

Competitive contracting

How often does buyer use non-competitive procedures?   detailed info 

29%
average 84%
Contract
Reason for negotiated procedure without publication
Original contract (Kč) Contract modification / NPWP (Kč)
Svoz odpadů ve městě Hlinsko
Not disclosed
- 22,995,820

Consistent conduct

Does buyer discourage bidders by frequent competition cancellations or modifications?   detailed info 

86%
average 69%
Type of flaw Result
Issued tenders without published result 0%
Cancelled contracts 14%
Average requirements modifications count 0

Journal data quality

Does buyer publish vital data in official journal?   detailed info 

95%
average 80%
Type of flaw Contracts count
Bidders count not published 0% (0 from 7)
Final or estimated price not published 0% (0 from 7)
Procedure type not published 0% (0 from 7)
Missing supplier ID 0% (0 from 7)
Missing buyer ID 0% (0 from 7)
Wrong buyer name 0% (0 from 7)
Missing call for tenders 14% (1 from 7)
Missing winning price 0% ( from 7)
Contract modification by more than 50 % 0% ( from 7)

Supplier rating

Do the risky firms win frequently?   detailed info 

100%
average 85%
Type of flaw Contracts count
Supplier founded less than 180 days before contract award 0% (0 from 7)
Supplier with over 75 % of turnover from public procurement 0% (0 from 7)
Subcontractor share above 50 % 0% (0 from 7)
Supplier demise shortly after contract 0% (0 from 7)
Supplier bankruptcy 0% (0 from 7)
Supplier donating to political party 0% (0 from 7)
Supplier did not publish financial results on time 0% (0 from 7)