Small cities • 2018 • past ranking

Město Hlinsko

IČO 00270059

Uncompetitive procedures are overused. Buyer does not support competition by using e-auctions, lots or extended deadlines.

Bidder participation

Is the level of competition satisfactory?   detailed info 

28%
average 49%
Largest contracts
Industry
Bids
Vybudování podzemních kontejnerů ve městě Hlinsko
Kontejnery a nádoby na odpad a odpadky
1
Ø2 in industry
Rekonstrukce komunikací Družstevní a Jiráskova Hlinsko
Stavební úpravy pro komunikace
7
Ø7 in industry
Konsolidace technologické a aplikační architektury TC MÚ Hlinsko
Informační systémy a servery
2
Ø2 in industry

Winner concentration

Isn't majority of contracts awarded to small circle of firms?   detailed info 

47%
average 55%
Largest suppliers Contracts count Contracts volume (Kč)
Technické služby Hlinsko, s.r.o.
1 22,995,820
INSTAV Hlinsko a.s.
1 11,884,923
HABAU CZ s.r.o.
1 9,274,488
AutoCont CZ a.s.
1 6,119,000

Public procurement share on total purchases

What fraction of purchases was made under procurement law?   detailed info 

44%
average 66%
Purchases Volume (Kč)
Public procurement 107,698,894
Unregulated purchases 439,901,007
Total 547,599,901

Competitive contracting

How often does buyer use non-competitive procedures?   detailed info 

9%
average 91%
Contract
Reason for negotiated procedure without publication
Price (Kč)
Svoz odpadů ve městě Hlinsko
Additional works
22,995,820

Journal data quality

Does buyer publish vital data in official journal?   detailed info 

100%
average 91%
Type of flaw Contracts count
Bidders count not published 0% (0 from 13)
Final or estimated price not published 0% (0 from 13)
Procedure type not published 0% (0 from 13)
Missing supplier ID 0% (0 from 13)
Missing buyer ID 0% (0 from 13)
Wrong buyer name 0% (0 from 13)
Call and award notices contradict each other 0% (0 from 13)
Missing call for tenders 0% (0 from 13)

Buyer profile data quality

Does the buyer profile fulfill the legal requirements?   detailed info 

42%
average 38%
Check Result
Is the buyers website consistent with central procurement registry? 67% (contracts)
Are there obvious flaws or inconsistencies within the data? 1.00 (average mistakes per contract)