Small cities • 2016

Město Hlučín

IČO 00300063

Often makes mistakes in procurement journal announcements. The supplier portfolio is relatively broad.

Bidder participation

Is the level of competition satisfactory?   detailed info 

54%
average 59%
Largest contracts
Industry
Bids
RPS - Hlučín, Regenerace panelového sídliště OKD-východ, II. etapa
Stavební práce
3
Ø5 in industry
Přístup ke hřbitovu „Na Březinách“ – Lávka
Mostní konstrukce
2
Ø5 in industry
Zateplení objektu ZŠ Dr. Miroslava Tyrše
Stavební práce
25
Ø5 in industry
Regenerace a rozšíření Základní školy Hlučín - Darkovičky
Stavební práce
12
Ø5 in industry
HW a SW pro rozšření TC ORP Hlučín
Hlavní počítače
2
Ø2 in industry

Winner concentration

Isn't majority of contracts awarded to small circle of firms?   detailed info 

78%
average 51%
Largest suppliers Contracts count Contracts volume Kč
Bdstav Morava s.r.o.
3 9,608,580
Alpine Bau Cz a.s.
1 7,416,602
Bystroň Group a.s.
2 7,177,367
Dev Company, spol. s r. o.
1 6,992,990
Autocont Cz a.s.
2 5,271,910
Other suppliers 9 16,181,941

Pro-competitive tools

Does the buyer foster the competition by using the available tools?   detailed info 

61%
average 64%
Tool Contracts count
Extended deadlines 67% (2 from 3)
Nonprice competition 0% (0 from 3)
Lots 0% (0 from 3)
E-auction 0% (0 from 3)

Competitive contracting

How often does buyer use non-competitive procedures?   detailed info 

100%
average 84%
Contract
Reason for negotiated procedure without publication
Price (Kč)
Rozšíření IS Ginis
Not disclosed
60,000

Consistent conduct

Does buyer discourage bidders by frequent competition cancellations or modifications?   detailed info 

83%
average 69%
Type of flaw Result
Issued calls without published result 0%
Cancelled contracts 0%
Average requirements modifications count 0.67

Journal data quality

Does buyer publish vital data in official journal?   detailed info 

50%
average 80%
Type of flaw Contracts count
Bidders count not published 0% (0 from 18)
Final or estimated price not published 61% (11 from 18)
Procedure type not published 0% (0 from 18)
Missing supplier ID 6% (1 from 18)
Missing buyer ID 0% (0 from 18)
Wrong buyer name 0% (0 from 18)
Call and award notices contradict each other 0% (0 from 18)
Missing call for tenders 56% (10 from 18)

Supplier rating

Do the risky firms win frequently?   detailed info 

59%
average 85%
Type of flaw Contracts count
Supplier founded less than 180 days before contract award 6% (1 from 18)
Supplier with over 75 % of turnover from public procurement 0% (0 from 18)
Subcontractor share above 50 % 11% (2 from 18)
Supplier demise shortly after contract 0% (0 from 18)
Supplier bankruptcy 0% (0 from 18)
Supplier donating to political party 22% (4 from 18)
Supplier did not publish financial results on time 28% (5 from 18)