Small cities • 2018 • past ranking

Město Turnov

IČO 00276227

Enough firms are competing for contracts. Lot of money goes into historical contracts and unregulated purchases.

66.
ranking
70%
zIndex

Bidder participation

Is the level of competition satisfactory?   detailed info 

82%
average 49%
Largest contracts
Industry
Bids
Rekonstrukce objektu č.p. 466, Skálova, Turnov
Stavební práce
8
Ø5 in industry
Městský park Turnov - etapa 1. - sportovní část
Stavební práce
6
Ø5 in industry
Regenerace panelového sídliště U nádraží, Turnov - 5.etapa
Stavební úpravy pro komunikace
5
Ø7 in industry
Inženýrské sítě v rozvojové lokalitě Hruštice-Károvsko, část C
Práce pro kompletní nebo částečnou výstavbu inženýrské stavitelství
4
Ø6 in industry
Výměna okenních výplní v ZŠ Turnov, Skálova, č.p. 600
Rekonstrukce budov
5
Ø4 in industry

Winner concentration

Isn't majority of contracts awarded to small circle of firms?   detailed info 

45%
average 55%
Largest suppliers Contracts count Contracts volume Kč
TERMIL s.r.o.
1 48,396,912
Amper Market, a.s.
2 10,254,158
MATEX HK s.r.o.
1 6,550,301
SaM silnice a mosty a.s.
1 5,900,395
EUROVIA CS, a.s.
1 5,790,000
Other suppliers 7 11,814,886

Pro-competitive tools

Does the buyer foster the competition by using the available tools?   detailed info 

50%
average 59%
Tool Contracts count
Extended deadlines 75% (3 from 4)
Nonprice competition 0% (0 from 4)
Lots 0% (0 from 4)
E-auction 0% (0 from 4)

Public procurement share on total purchases

What fraction of purchases was made under procurement law?   detailed info 

39%
average 66%
Purchases Volume (Kč)
Public procurement 148,345,379
Unregulated purchases 828,605,482
Total 976,950,861

Competitive contracting

How often does buyer use non-competitive procedures?   detailed info 

98%
average 91%
Contract
Reason for negotiated procedure without publication
Price (Kč)
Kompostárna bioodpadu - Město Turnov - dodatečné stavební práce
Additional works
438,795

Consistent conduct

Does buyer discourage bidders by frequent competition cancellations or modifications?   detailed info 

50%
average 77%
Type of flaw Result
Issued calls without published result 0%
Cancelled contracts 50%
Average requirements modifications count 0.25

Journal data quality

Does buyer publish vital data in official journal?   detailed info 

100%
average 91%
Type of flaw Contracts count
Bidders count not published 0% (0 from 15)
Final or estimated price not published 0% (0 from 15)
Procedure type not published 0% (0 from 15)
Missing supplier ID 0% (0 from 15)
Missing buyer ID 0% (0 from 15)
Wrong buyer name 0% (0 from 15)
Call and award notices contradict each other 0% (0 from 15)
Missing call for tenders 0% (0 from 15)

Buyer profile data quality

Does the buyer profile fulfill the legal requirements?   detailed info 

62%
average 38%
Check Result
Is the buyers website consistent with central procurement registry? 71% (contracts)
Are there obvious flaws or inconsistencies within the data? 0.36 (average mistakes per contract)