Small cities • 2018 • past ranking

Město Poděbrady

IČO 00239640

Good buyer. Buyer profile is in relatively good shape. Relatively small fraction of purchases is spent according to law.

11.
ranking
78%
zIndex

Bidder participation

Is the level of competition satisfactory?   detailed info 

50%
average 49%
Largest contracts
Industry
Bids
Údržba veřejné zeleně v centrální části města Poděbrady
Zahradnické služby
3
Ø5 in industry
Rekonstrukce Městské knihovny v Poděbradech
Stavební práce
6
Ø5 in industry
Snížení energetické náročnosti budovy ZŠ T.G.M. v ulici Žižkova v Poděbradech
Stavební práce
6
Ø5 in industry
Konsolidace IT a nové služby TC Poděbrady
Informační systémy a servery
3
Ø2 in industry
„Údržba vodních prvků a vrtů minerální vody v Poděbradech“
Environmentální služby
1
Ø4 in industry

Winner concentration

Isn't majority of contracts awarded to small circle of firms?   detailed info 

67%
average 55%
Largest suppliers Contracts count Contracts volume (Kč)
New Visit s.r.o.
1 19,956,698
Chládek a Tintěra, Pardubice a.s.
1 12,652,062
PMS, spol. s r.o.
1 11,387,644
AutoCont CZ a.s.
1 5,712,265
AQUA ENVIRO s.r.o.
1 5,579,832
Other suppliers 4 10,921,354

Pro-competitive tools

Does the buyer foster the competition by using the available tools?   detailed info 

67%
average 59%
Tool Contracts count
Extended deadlines 20% (1 from 5)
Nonprice competition 20% (1 from 5)
Lots 0% (0 from 5)
E-auction 0% (0 from 5)

Public procurement share on total purchases

What fraction of purchases was made under procurement law?   detailed info 

53%
average 66%
Purchases Volume (Kč)
Public procurement 291,501,993
Unregulated purchases 754,219,220
Total 1,045,721,213

Competitive contracting

How often does buyer use non-competitive procedures?   detailed info 

100%
average 91%
No contracts in negotiated procedure without publication.

Consistent conduct

Does buyer discourage bidders by frequent competition cancellations or modifications?   detailed info 

65%
average 77%
Type of flaw Result
Issued calls without published result 0%
Cancelled contracts 20%
Average requirements modifications count 1.20

Journal data quality

Does buyer publish vital data in official journal?   detailed info 

100%
average 91%
Type of flaw Contracts count
Bidders count not published 0% (0 from 12)
Final or estimated price not published 0% (0 from 12)
Procedure type not published 0% (0 from 12)
Missing supplier ID 8% (1 from 12)
Missing buyer ID 0% (0 from 12)
Wrong buyer name 0% (0 from 12)
Call and award notices contradict each other 0% (0 from 12)
Missing call for tenders 0% (0 from 12)

Buyer profile data quality

Does the buyer profile fulfill the legal requirements?   detailed info 

100%
average 38%
Check Result
Is the buyers website consistent with central procurement registry? 100% (contracts)
Are there obvious flaws or inconsistencies within the data? 0.00 (average mistakes per contract)