Small cities • 2016

Město Milovice

IČO 00239453

Uncompetitive procedures are overused. Applicants are discouraged by frequent competition modifications and cancellations.

Bidder participation

Is the level of competition satisfactory?   detailed info 

37%
average 59%
Largest contracts
Industry
Bids
Zajištění školního stravování a stravování zaměstnanců škol - Milovice - Mladá
Poskytování jídel pro školy
1
Ø2 in industry
Propojení ul. Armádní se silnicí II/272 Milovice
Stavební práce
8
Ø5 in industry
Dodávka nábytku pro ZŠ Juventa
Nábytek
7
Ø4 in industry
"Tůně Milovice - Josefov"
Stavební práce
3
Ø5 in industry
Dodávka výpočetní techniky pro ZŠ Juventa
Počítačová příslušenství
3
Ø2 in industry

Winner concentration

Isn't majority of contracts awarded to small circle of firms?   detailed info 

31%
average 51%
Largest suppliers Contracts count Contracts volume (Kč)
Scolarest - zařízení školního stravování spol. s r.o.
1 43,629,562
Strabag a.s.
1 20,446,754
Quick Office s.r.o.
1 4,199,010
Rovina, a.s.
1 2,895,462
C System Cz a.s.
1 2,011,107

Pro-competitive tools

Does the buyer foster the competition by using the available tools?   detailed info 

61%
average 64%
Tool Contracts count
Extended deadlines 50% (1 from 2)
Nonprice competition 0% (0 from 2)
Lots 0% (0 from 2)
E-auction 0% (0 from 2)

Competitive contracting

How often does buyer use non-competitive procedures?   detailed info 

3%
average 84%
Contract
Reason for negotiated procedure without publication
Price (Kč)
Zajištění školního stravování a stravování zaměstnanců škol - Milovice - Mladá
Předchozí zakázka bez nabídek
43,629,562

Consistent conduct

Does buyer discourage bidders by frequent competition cancellations or modifications?   detailed info 

31%
average 69%
Type of flaw Result
Issued calls without published result 0%
Cancelled contracts 50%
Average requirements modifications count 0.75

Journal data quality

Does buyer publish vital data in official journal?   detailed info 

97%
average 80%
Type of flaw Contracts count
Bidders count not published 0% (0 from 5)
Final or estimated price not published 0% (0 from 5)
Procedure type not published 0% (0 from 5)
Missing supplier ID 0% (0 from 5)
Missing buyer ID 0% (0 from 5)
Wrong buyer name 0% (0 from 5)
Call and award notices contradict each other 0% (0 from 5)
Missing call for tenders 20% (1 from 5)

Supplier rating

Do the risky firms win frequently?   detailed info 

95%
average 85%
Type of flaw Contracts count
Supplier founded less than 180 days before contract award 0% (0 from 5)
Supplier with over 75 % of turnover from public procurement 0% (0 from 5)
Subcontractor share above 50 % 0% (0 from 5)
Supplier demise shortly after contract 0% (0 from 5)
Supplier bankruptcy 0% (0 from 5)
Supplier donating to political party 40% (2 from 5)
Supplier did not publish financial results on time 0% (0 from 5)