Small cities • 2016

Město Nové Město na Moravě

IČO 00294900

Good buyer. Tender documentation is well prepared, thus there is no need to modify or cancel the procedure. Small number of firms recieve most of contracts.

45.
ranking
77%
zIndex

Bidder participation

Is the level of competition satisfactory?   detailed info 

54%
average 59%
Largest contracts
Industry
Bids
Bazén – Relaxační centrum, Hornická, Nové Město na Moravě
Výstavba středisek pro volný čas
4
Ø3 in industry
NÁSTAVBA, PŘÍSTAVBA A STAVEBNÍ ÚPRAVY MATEŘSKÉ ŠKOLY NOVÉ MĚSTO NA MORAVĚ
Stavební úpravy budov mateřských škol
5
Ø5 in industry
Protipovodňová opatření pro město Nové Město na Moravě
Prevence záplav
3
Ø3 in industry
Projekt specializovaných sportovních tras na Novoměstsku
Výstavba stezek pro pěší
5
Ø5 in industry
Rekonstrukce a rozšíření objektu čp. 350, Nové Město na Moravě – Centrum Zdislava
Stavební úpravy zařízení sociální péče
10
Ø5 in industry

Winner concentration

Isn't majority of contracts awarded to small circle of firms?   detailed info 

40%
average 51%
Largest suppliers Contracts count Contracts volume Kč
Pks stavby a.s.
6 103,430,243
Gremis, s.r.o.
3 17,937,743
Sph stavby s.r.o.
5 8,461,448
Bártek Rozhlasy, s.r.o.
1 8,404,350
E.on Energie, a.s.
3 7,246,744
Other suppliers 19 30,224,051

Pro-competitive tools

Does the buyer foster the competition by using the available tools?   detailed info 

70%
average 64%

Competitive contracting

How often does buyer use non-competitive procedures?   detailed info 

74%
average 84%

Consistent conduct

Does buyer discourage bidders by frequent competition cancellations or modifications?   detailed info 

100%
average 69%
Type of flaw Result
Issued calls without published result 0%
Cancelled contracts 0%
Average requirements modifications count 0

Journal data quality

Does buyer publish vital data in official journal?   detailed info 

85%
average 80%
Type of flaw Contracts count
Bidders count not published 0% (0 from 37)
Final or estimated price not published 32% (12 from 37)
Procedure type not published 0% (0 from 37)
Missing supplier ID 5% (2 from 37)
Missing buyer ID 0% (0 from 37)
Wrong buyer name 0% (0 from 37)
Call and award notices contradict each other 0% (0 from 37)
Missing call for tenders 0% (0 from 37)

Supplier rating

Do the risky firms win frequently?   detailed info 

94%
average 85%
Type of flaw Contracts count
Supplier founded less than 180 days before contract award 0% (0 from 37)
Supplier with over 75 % of turnover from public procurement 0% (0 from 37)
Subcontractor share above 50 % 0% (0 from 37)
Supplier demise shortly after contract 0% (0 from 37)
Supplier bankruptcy 0% (0 from 37)
Supplier donating to political party 3% (1 from 37)
Supplier did not publish financial results on time 19% (7 from 37)