Large cities • 2016

Město Krnov

IČO 00296139

Calls for tenders are often modified or cancelled. Competitions are open to multiple bidders.

Bidder participation

Is the level of competition satisfactory?   detailed info 

81%
average 63%
Largest contracts
Industry
Bids
Průmyslová zóna Krnov – Červený dvůr II.etapa
Stavební práce
18
Ø5 in industry
Obnova Smetanových sadů a navazujících ploch v Krnově
Stavební práce
19
Ø5 in industry
Rekonstrukce domů – Krnov, Stará 15,17
Stavební práce
6
Ø5 in industry
Krnov, rekonstrukce kanalizace na ulici Bruntálská
Stavební práce na výstavbě kanalizace
5
Ø5 in industry
Rekonstrukce mostu ev. č. M6 přes řeku Opavu na ul. Opavská v Krnově
Stavební práce
6
Ø5 in industry

Winner concentration

Isn't majority of contracts awarded to small circle of firms?   detailed info 

67%
average 76%
Largest suppliers Contracts count Contracts volume (Kč)
Strabag a.s.
1 52,790,252
Aleš Fousek
2 22,814,171
Stafi Cz s.r.o.
1 13,516,357
Vodostav Ostrava, spol. s r.o.
1 12,750,429
Terno Firek s.r.o.
10 12,551,473
Other suppliers 14 34,789,370

Pro-competitive tools

Does the buyer foster the competition by using the available tools?   detailed info 

72%
average 70%
Tool Contracts count
Extended deadlines 60% (3 from 5)
Nonprice competition 0% (0 from 5)
Lots 20% (1 from 5)
E-auction 0% (0 from 5)

Public procurement share on total purchases

What fraction of purchases was made under procurement law?   detailed info 

47%
average 57%
Purchases Volume (Kč)
Public procurement 149,843,876
Unregulated purchases 517,161,561
Total 667,005,437

Competitive contracting

How often does buyer use non-competitive procedures?   detailed info 

100%
average 77%
No contracts in negotiated procedure without publication.

Consistent conduct

Does buyer discourage bidders by frequent competition cancellations or modifications?   detailed info 

38%
average 65%
Type of flaw Result
Issued calls without published result 0%
Cancelled contracts 50%
Average requirements modifications count 1.00

Journal data quality

Does buyer publish vital data in official journal?   detailed info 

73%
average 83%
Type of flaw Contracts count
Bidders count not published 0% (0 from 29)
Final or estimated price not published 24% (7 from 29)
Procedure type not published 0% (0 from 29)
Missing supplier ID 14% (4 from 29)
Missing buyer ID 0% (0 from 29)
Wrong buyer name 0% (0 from 29)
Call and award notices contradict each other 0% (0 from 29)
Missing call for tenders 28% (8 from 29)

Buyer profile data quality

Does the buyer profile fulfill the legal requirements?   detailed info 

39%
average 46%
Check Result
Is the buyers website consistent with central procurement registry? 50% (contracts)
Are there obvious flaws or inconsistencies within the data? 0.91 (average mistakes per contract)

Supplier rating

Do the risky firms win frequently?   detailed info 

89%
average 84%
Type of flaw Contracts count
Supplier founded less than 180 days before contract award 0% (0 from 29)
Supplier with over 75 % of turnover from public procurement 0% (0 from 29)
Subcontractor share above 50 % 0% (0 from 29)
Supplier demise shortly after contract 0% (0 from 29)
Supplier bankruptcy 7% (2 from 29)
Supplier donating to political party 0% (0 from 29)
Supplier did not publish financial results on time 55% (16 from 29)