Small cities • 2018 • past ranking

Město Ústí nad Orlicí

IČO 00279676

Buyer does not support competition by using e-auctions, lots or extended deadlines. Buyer profile is in relatively good shape.

Bidder participation

Is the level of competition satisfactory?   detailed info 

51%
average 49%
Largest contracts
Industry
Bids
Snížení energetické náročnosti MŠ Na Výsluní 200, Ústí nad Orlicí
Rekonstrukce budov
4
Ø4 in industry
Zateplení ZŠ Na Štěpnici 300, Ústí nad Orlicí, číslo projektu: CZ.1.02/3.2.00/13.21048
Stavební práce
15
Ø5 in industry
„Rekonstrukce ul. T. G. Masaryka v Ústí nad Orlicí“
Stavební úpravy pro komunikace
12
Ø7 in industry
DEMOLICE OBJEKTŮ V AREÁLU PERLA 01
Demoliční práce
9
Ø10 in industry
Centrální pojištění města Ústí nad Orlicí
Pojištění majetku
1
Ø2 in industry

Winner concentration

Isn't majority of contracts awarded to small circle of firms?   detailed info 

80%
average 55%
Largest suppliers Contracts count Contracts volume Kč
HELP, silnice - železnice s.r.o.
2 17,195,886
DACH SYSTEM s.r.o.
1 9,987,013
První Vysokomýtská stavební společnost s.r.o.
2 9,839,780
TREPART s.r.o.
1 9,109,121
Kooperativa pojišťovna, a.s., Vienna Insurance Group
1 8,038,176
Other suppliers 11 30,427,258

Pro-competitive tools

Does the buyer foster the competition by using the available tools?   detailed info 

0%
average 59%
Tool Contracts count
Extended deadlines 0% (0 from 4)
Nonprice competition 0% (0 from 4)
Lots 0% (0 from 4)
E-auction 0% (0 from 4)

Public procurement share on total purchases

What fraction of purchases was made under procurement law?   detailed info 

43%
average 66%
Purchases Volume (Kč)
Public procurement 142,578,820
Unregulated purchases 614,616,727
Total 757,195,547

Competitive contracting

How often does buyer use non-competitive procedures?   detailed info 

99%
average 91%
Contract
Reason for negotiated procedure without publication
Price (Kč)
Zateplení ZŠ Na Štěpnici 300, Ústí nad Orlicí, číslo projektu: CZ.1.02/3.2.00/13.21048 – dodatečné stavební práce
Additional works
136,931

Consistent conduct

Does buyer discourage bidders by frequent competition cancellations or modifications?   detailed info 

75%
average 77%
Type of flaw Result
Issued calls without published result 0%
Cancelled contracts 25%
Average requirements modifications count 0.25

Journal data quality

Does buyer publish vital data in official journal?   detailed info 

86%
average 91%
Type of flaw Contracts count
Bidders count not published 6% (1 from 18)
Final or estimated price not published 17% (3 from 18)
Procedure type not published 0% (0 from 18)
Missing supplier ID 11% (2 from 18)
Missing buyer ID 0% (0 from 18)
Wrong buyer name 6% (1 from 18)
Call and award notices contradict each other 0% (0 from 18)
Missing call for tenders 17% (3 from 18)

Buyer profile data quality

Does the buyer profile fulfill the legal requirements?   detailed info 

82%
average 38%
Check Result
Is the buyers website consistent with central procurement registry? 94% (contracts)
Are there obvious flaws or inconsistencies within the data? 0.47 (average mistakes per contract)