Small cities • 2016

Město Červený Kostelec

IČO 00272566

The supplier portfolio is relatively broad. Buyer does not modify or cancel tenders which fosters competition.

91.
ranking
74%
zIndex

Bidder participation

Is the level of competition satisfactory?   detailed info 

61%
average 59%
Largest contracts
Industry
Bids
Rekonstrukce ul. Langrova, Žďárská, Rybničná v Červeném Kostelci
Stavební úpravy pro komunikace
3
Ø5 in industry
Červený Kostelec – Stolín – Mstětín, splašková kanalizace
Stavební práce na výstavbě kanalizace
8
Ø5 in industry
Červený Kostelec, Bohdašín - splašková kanalizace
Stavební práce na výstavbě kanalizace
14
Ø5 in industry
Snížení energetické náročnosti objektu Zdravotního střediska
Stavební práce
7
Ø5 in industry
Technická infrastruktura pro 7 RD Větrník, Červený Kostelec
Stavební úpravy pro komunikace
4
Ø5 in industry

Winner concentration

Isn't majority of contracts awarded to small circle of firms?   detailed info 

77%
average 51%
Largest suppliers Contracts count Contracts volume Kč
Syner, s.r.o.
2 17,754,199
Strabag a.s.
1 14,987,727
Stylbau, s.r.o.
2 11,174,436
Pohl cz, a.s.
1 8,953,280
Eurovia Cs, a.s.
1 5,771,314
Other suppliers 11 25,109,281

Pro-competitive tools

Does the buyer foster the competition by using the available tools?   detailed info 

61%
average 64%
Tool Contracts count
Extended deadlines 20% (1 from 5)
Nonprice competition 0% (0 from 5)
Lots 0% (0 from 5)
E-auction 0% (0 from 5)

Competitive contracting

How often does buyer use non-competitive procedures?   detailed info 

91%
average 84%
Contract
Reason for negotiated procedure without publication
Price (Kč)
Systém svozu bioodpadů Červený Kostelec
Not disclosed
1,884,600

Consistent conduct

Does buyer discourage bidders by frequent competition cancellations or modifications?   detailed info 

83%
average 69%
Type of flaw Result
Issued calls without published result 0%
Cancelled contracts 17%
Average requirements modifications count 0

Journal data quality

Does buyer publish vital data in official journal?   detailed info 

77%
average 80%
Type of flaw Contracts count
Bidders count not published 0% (0 from 18)
Final or estimated price not published 0% (0 from 18)
Procedure type not published 0% (0 from 18)
Missing supplier ID 17% (3 from 18)
Missing buyer ID 0% (0 from 18)
Wrong buyer name 0% (0 from 18)
Call and award notices contradict each other 0% (0 from 18)
Missing call for tenders 33% (6 from 18)

Supplier rating

Do the risky firms win frequently?   detailed info 

80%
average 85%
Type of flaw Contracts count
Supplier founded less than 180 days before contract award 0% (0 from 18)
Supplier with over 75 % of turnover from public procurement 6% (1 from 18)
Subcontractor share above 50 % 0% (0 from 18)
Supplier demise shortly after contract 0% (0 from 18)
Supplier bankruptcy 0% (0 from 18)
Supplier donating to political party 6% (1 from 18)
Supplier did not publish financial results on time 11% (2 from 18)