Large cities • 2016

Město Hodonín

IČO 00284891

Calls for tenders are often modified or cancelled.

Bidder participation

Is the level of competition satisfactory?   detailed info 

58%
average 63%
Largest contracts
Industry
Bids
Provozování Městské autobusové dopravy v Hodoníně
Služby veřejné silniční dopravy
Not disclosed
Ø3 in industry
Denní lázně BLISS DAY SPA
Stavební úpravy budov sloužících pro zdravotní a sociální péči, krematorií a veřejných záchodků
12
Ø4 in industry
Stavební úpravy a dostavby kulturního domu Horní Valy, Hodonín
Stavební práce
4
Ø5 in industry
IPRM Hodonín - revitalizace veřejných prostranství
Výstavba parkovišť
5
Ø5 in industry
„Zateplení budovy MěÚ Národní třída č.25, Hodonín“
Stavební práce
3
Ø5 in industry

Winner concentration

Isn't majority of contracts awarded to small circle of firms?   detailed info 

70%
average 76%
Largest suppliers Contracts count Contracts volume Kč
Čsad Hodonín a.s.
1 71,338,050
Hrušecká stavební spol. s r.o.
2 64,021,295
Manag, a.s.
1 63,720,312
Swietelsky stavební s.r.o.
3 28,676,658
Stavební Firma Plus s.r.o.
2 22,595,328
Other suppliers 13 52,657,842

Pro-competitive tools

Does the buyer foster the competition by using the available tools?   detailed info 

69%
average 70%
Tool Contracts count
Extended deadlines 0% (2 from 0)
Nonprice competition 0% (0 from 8)
Division into lots 12% (1 from 8)
E-auction 0% (0 from 8)
Innovative procedure 0% ( from 8)

Public procurement share on total purchases

What fraction of purchases was made under procurement law?   detailed info 

59%
average 57%
Purchases Volume (Kč)
Public procurement 334,253,734
Small scale tenders 0
Unregulated purchases 621,366,656
Total 955,620,390

Competitive contracting

How often does buyer use non-competitive procedures?   detailed info 

87%
average 77%
Contract
Reason for negotiated procedure without publication
Original contract (Kč) Contract modification / NPWP (Kč)
Dodatečné požadavky objednatele při realizaci projektu „Zateplení krytého bazénu TEZA Hodonín“
Krajní naléhavost, Dodatečné práce
- 5,067,765
TI Výhon- Černý most
Not disclosed
- 2,960,190
Dodatečné požadavky objednatele při realizaci projektu „Zateplení budovy MěÚ Horní Valy č. 2, Hodonín“
Dodatečné práce
- 1,341,448
Vícepráce při realizaci projektu „Zateplení krytého bazénu TEZA Hodonín“ č. 2
Dodatečné práce
- 833,147
Vícepráce při realizaci projektu „Zateplení krytého bazénu TEZA Hodonín“
Dodatečné práce
- 689,718

Consistent conduct

Does buyer discourage bidders by frequent competition cancellations or modifications?   detailed info 

40%
average 65%
Type of flaw Result
Issued tenders without published result 19%
Cancelled contracts 25%
Average requirements modifications count 1.13

Journal data quality

Does buyer publish vital data in official journal?   detailed info 

70%
average 83%
Type of flaw Contracts count
Bidders count not published 9% (2 from 22)
Final or estimated price not published 41% (9 from 22)
Procedure type not published 0% (0 from 22)
Missing supplier ID 9% (2 from 22)
Missing buyer ID 0% (0 from 22)
Wrong buyer name 0% (0 from 22)
Missing call for tenders 9% (2 from 22)
Missing winning price 0% ( from 22)
Contract modification by more than 50 % 0% ( from 22)

Buyer profile data quality

Does the buyer profile fulfill the legal requirements?   detailed info 

30%
average 46%
Check Result
Is the buyers website consistent with central procurement registry? 42% (contracts)
Are there obvious flaws or inconsistencies within the data? 1.18 (average mistakes per contract)
Are small scale tenders published on a buyer profile? (Compared to quantity of tenders under the law)
0-250K 0 tenders
250K-500K 0 tenders
500K-1000K 0 tenders
1000K+ 0 tenders

Supplier rating

Do the risky firms win frequently?   detailed info 

75%
average 84%
Type of flaw Contracts count
Supplier founded less than 180 days before contract award 0% (0 from 22)
Supplier with over 75 % of turnover from public procurement 0% (0 from 22)
Subcontractor share above 50 % 0% (0 from 22)
Supplier demise shortly after contract 0% (0 from 22)
Supplier bankruptcy 0% (0 from 22)
Supplier donating to political party 27% (6 from 22)
Supplier did not publish financial results on time 18% (4 from 22)