Small cities • 2016

Město Třešť

IČO 00286753

Often makes mistakes in procurement journal announcements. Calls for tenders are often modified or cancelled.

Bidder participation

Is the level of competition satisfactory?   detailed info 

62%
average 59%
Largest contracts
Industry
Bids
"Rekonstrukce stávajícího hlinitopísčitého hřiště kopané na víceúčelové hřiště s celoročním využitím pro zákkladní školu a fotbalové kluby"
Různé specializované stavební práce
4
Ø4 in industry
Třešť, ul. Partlicova
Výkopové a zemní práce
16
Ø4 in industry
Realizace energetických úspor – Dům seniorů v Třešti
Stavební úpravy zařízení sociální péče
4
Ø5 in industry
Třešť, Hodická II. etapa - komunikace a inženýrské sítě
Výkopové a zemní práce
14
Ø4 in industry
Zateplení ZŠ Barvířská ul. Třešť
Stavební úpravy školních budov
4
Ø5 in industry

Winner concentration

Isn't majority of contracts awarded to small circle of firms?   detailed info 

58%
average 51%
Largest suppliers Contracts count Contracts volume Kč
Sport-technik Bohemia s.r.o.
1 12,614,340
Eurovia Cs, a.s.
1 11,779,472
Podzimek a synové s.r.o.
2 5,618,097
Porr a.s.
2 4,586,567
Starkon a.s.
1 1,959,748
Other suppliers 4 2,120,204

Pro-competitive tools

Does the buyer foster the competition by using the available tools?   detailed info 

100%
average 64%
Tool Contracts count
Extended deadlines 0% (0 from 0)
Nonprice competition 0% (0 from 0)
Lots 0% (0 from 0)
E-auction 0% (0 from 0)

Competitive contracting

How often does buyer use non-competitive procedures?   detailed info 

81%
average 84%
Contract
Reason for negotiated procedure without publication
Price (Kč)
Mateřská škola Třešť – zateplení objektů a změna topného systému - dodatečné práce
Not disclosed
1,255,435
Třešť, ul. Hodická - II. etapa, komunikace a inženýrské sítě
Předchozí zakázka bez nabídek, Krajní naléhavost
759,528

Consistent conduct

Does buyer discourage bidders by frequent competition cancellations or modifications?   detailed info 

0%
average 69%
Type of flaw Result
Issued calls without published result 100%
Cancelled contracts 0%
Average requirements modifications count 0.67

Journal data quality

Does buyer publish vital data in official journal?   detailed info 

10%
average 80%
Type of flaw Contracts count
Bidders count not published 0% (0 from 11)
Final or estimated price not published 9% (1 from 11)
Procedure type not published 0% (0 from 11)
Missing supplier ID 0% (0 from 11)
Missing buyer ID 0% (0 from 11)
Wrong buyer name 0% (0 from 11)
Call and award notices contradict each other 0% (0 from 11)
Missing call for tenders 45% (5 from 11)

Supplier rating

Do the risky firms win frequently?   detailed info 

75%
average 85%
Type of flaw Contracts count
Supplier founded less than 180 days before contract award 0% (0 from 11)
Supplier with over 75 % of turnover from public procurement 0% (0 from 11)
Subcontractor share above 50 % 0% (0 from 11)
Supplier demise shortly after contract 0% (0 from 11)
Supplier bankruptcy 0% (0 from 11)
Supplier donating to political party 18% (2 from 11)
Supplier did not publish financial results on time 27% (3 from 11)