Large cities • 2016

Statutární město Zlín

IČO 00283924

The supplier portfolio is relatively broad.

24.
ranking
73%
zIndex

Bidder participation

Is the level of competition satisfactory?   detailed info 

67%
average 63%
Largest contracts
Industry
Bids
„Rámcová smlouva na opravy a rekonstrukce komunikací ve vlastnictví statutárního města Zlína "
Stavební úpravy pro komunikace
4
Ø5 in industry
Rekonstrukce komunikace ul. Mostní, Zlín
Stavební práce
10
Ø5 in industry
„Rekonstrukce komunikace ulice J. Staši a ulice Tyršova - Malenovice I. a II etapa"
Stavební práce
7
Ø5 in industry
Revitalizace prostoru parku Komenského ve Zlíně
Stavební práce
16
Ø5 in industry
Rekonstrukce podchodu na náměstí Práce ve Zlíně
Stavební práce
19
Ø5 in industry

Winner concentration

Isn't majority of contracts awarded to small circle of firms?   detailed info 

91%
average 76%
Largest suppliers Contracts count Contracts volume Kč
Strabag a.s.
3 85,417,908
Kks, spol. s r.o.
7 61,248,602
Pozimos, a.s.
5 61,169,391
Dips Zlín, spol. s r.o.
3 53,920,568
Eurovia Cs, a.s.
9 43,118,844
Other suppliers 127 506,213,159

Pro-competitive tools

Does the buyer foster the competition by using the available tools?   detailed info 

84%
average 70%
Tool Contracts count
Extended deadlines 0% (15 from 0)
Nonprice competition 10% (4 from 41)
Division into lots 22% (9 from 41)
E-auction 10% (4 from 41)
Innovative procedure 0% ( from 41)

Public procurement share on total purchases

What fraction of purchases was made under procurement law?   detailed info 

65%
average 57%
Purchases Volume (Kč)
Public procurement 868,893,300
Small scale tenders 0
Unregulated purchases 1,176,458,987
Total 2,045,352,287

Competitive contracting

How often does buyer use non-competitive procedures?   detailed info 

84%
average 77%

Consistent conduct

Does buyer discourage bidders by frequent competition cancellations or modifications?   detailed info 

68%
average 65%
Type of flaw Result
Issued tenders without published result 6%
Cancelled contracts 10%
Average requirements modifications count 0.79

Journal data quality

Does buyer publish vital data in official journal?   detailed info 

85%
average 83%
Type of flaw Contracts count
Bidders count not published 23% (36 from 155)
Final or estimated price not published 27% (42 from 155)
Procedure type not published 0% (0 from 155)
Missing supplier ID 1% (2 from 155)
Missing buyer ID 0% (0 from 155)
Wrong buyer name 0% (0 from 155)
Missing call for tenders 7% (11 from 155)
Missing winning price 0% ( from 155)
Contract modification by more than 50 % 0% ( from 155)

Buyer profile data quality

Does the buyer profile fulfill the legal requirements?   detailed info 

33%
average 46%
Check Result
Is the buyers website consistent with central procurement registry? 40% (contracts)
Are there obvious flaws or inconsistencies within the data? 0.65 (average mistakes per contract)
Are small scale tenders published on a buyer profile? (Compared to quantity of tenders under the law)
0-250K 0 tenders
250K-500K 0 tenders
500K-1000K 0 tenders
1000K+ 0 tenders

Supplier rating

Do the risky firms win frequently?   detailed info 

81%
average 84%
Type of flaw Contracts count
Supplier founded less than 180 days before contract award 0% (0 from 155)
Supplier with over 75 % of turnover from public procurement 0% (0 from 155)
Subcontractor share above 50 % 1% (1 from 155)
Supplier demise shortly after contract 0% (0 from 155)
Supplier bankruptcy 0% (0 from 155)
Supplier donating to political party 13% (20 from 155)
Supplier did not publish financial results on time 25% (38 from 155)