Large cities • 2018 • past ranking

Statutární město Zlín

IČO 00283924

Court found serious misconduct. The supplier portfolio is relatively broad.

19.
ranking
75%
zIndex

Bidder participation

Is the level of competition satisfactory?   detailed info 

63%
average 52%
Largest contracts
Industry
Bids
Rekonstrukce komunikace ul. Mostní, Zlín
Stavební práce
10
Ø5 in industry
Kanalizace Velíková
Stavební práce na výstavbě kanalizace
12
Ø7 in industry
Památník Tomáše Bati
Stavební práce
5
Ø5 in industry
Pojištění majetku a odpovědnosti SMZ a jím zřízených či založených organizací
Pojištění majetku
2
Ø2 in industry
„Celková rekonstrukce budovy 25m bazénu ve Zlíně – II. etapa“
Stavební práce
4
Ø5 in industry

Winner concentration

Isn't majority of contracts awarded to small circle of firms?   detailed info 

89%
average 70%
Largest suppliers Contracts count Contracts volume Kč
SMO a.s.
7 64,135,120
KKS, spol. s r.o.
7 63,858,426
EUROVIA CS, a.s.
6 62,263,816
E.ON Energie, a.s.
3 55,711,975
STRABAG a.s.
4 50,198,860
Other suppliers 82 348,973,744

Pro-competitive tools

Does the buyer foster the competition by using the available tools?   detailed info 

78%
average 71%
Tool Contracts count
Extended deadlines 36% (12 from 33)
Nonprice competition 3% (1 from 33)
Lots 15% (5 from 33)
E-auction 18% (6 from 33)

Public procurement share on total purchases

What fraction of purchases was made under procurement law?   detailed info 

62%
average 56%
Purchases Volume (Kč)
Public procurement 1,229,583,794
Unregulated purchases 2,014,528,181
Total 3,244,111,975

Competitive contracting

How often does buyer use non-competitive procedures?   detailed info 

83%
average 87%

Consistent conduct

Does buyer discourage bidders by frequent competition cancellations or modifications?   detailed info 

91%
average 77%
Type of flaw Result
Issued calls without published result 0%
Cancelled contracts 3%
Average requirements modifications count 0.67

Journal data quality

Does buyer publish vital data in official journal?   detailed info 

87%
average 90%
Type of flaw Contracts count
Bidders count not published 7% (6 from 91)
Final or estimated price not published 27% (25 from 91)
Procedure type not published 0% (0 from 91)
Missing supplier ID 2% (2 from 91)
Missing buyer ID 2% (2 from 91)
Wrong buyer name 3% (3 from 91)
Call and award notices contradict each other 0% (0 from 91)
Missing call for tenders 4% (4 from 91)

Buyer profile data quality

Does the buyer profile fulfill the legal requirements?   detailed info 

62%
average 55%
Check Result
Is the buyers website consistent with central procurement registry? 84% (contracts)
Are there obvious flaws or inconsistencies within the data? 0.90 (average mistakes per contract)