City parts • 2016

Městská část Praha 15

IČO 00231355

The competition for contracts is low. Procurement journal misses vital information (prices, suppliers..).

Bidder participation

Is the level of competition satisfactory?   detailed info 

33%
average 53%
Largest contracts
Industry
Bids
CPV Bolevecká - rekonstrukce - I. etapa
Stavební práce
3
Ø5 in industry
Letní a zimní údržba komunikací a zeleně na území Městské části Praha 15
Zahradnické služby
6
Ø6 in industry
Zateplení ZŠ Praha 10 Křimická
Stavební práce
4
Ø5 in industry
Rekonstrukce ul. prostoru a obnova vodovodního řadu - oblast Nová Hostivař, Praha 15
Práce vztahující se k vodovodnímu potrubí
5
Ø5 in industry
Výstavba dětského dopravního hřiště
Stavební úpravy sportovních zařízení
3
Ø4 in industry

Winner concentration

Isn't majority of contracts awarded to small circle of firms?   detailed info 

68%
average 63%
Largest suppliers Contracts count Contracts volume (Kč)
Bau plus, a.s.
1 43,674,988
Green Project s.r.o.
1 27,810,846
Dereza, společnost s ručením omezeným
1 19,799,184
Prominecon Cz a.s.
1 12,424,546
Zepris s.r.o.
1 6,703,831
Other suppliers 7 27,625,894

Pro-competitive tools

Does the buyer foster the competition by using the available tools?   detailed info 

61%
average 62%
Tool Contracts count
Extended deadlines 20% (1 from 5)
Nonprice competition 60% (3 from 5)
Lots 0% (0 from 5)
E-auction 0% (0 from 5)

Competitive contracting

How often does buyer use non-competitive procedures?   detailed info 

93%
average 81%
Contract
Reason for negotiated procedure without publication
Price (Kč)
Snížení prašnosti na území Prahy 15 - čistící vůz
Not disclosed
2,373,000

Consistent conduct

Does buyer discourage bidders by frequent competition cancellations or modifications?   detailed info 

79%
average 67%
Type of flaw Result
Issued calls without published result 17%
Cancelled contracts 0%
Average requirements modifications count 0.17

Journal data quality

Does buyer publish vital data in official journal?   detailed info 

75%
average 88%
Type of flaw Contracts count
Bidders count not published 0% (0 from 12)
Final or estimated price not published 0% (0 from 12)
Procedure type not published 0% (0 from 12)
Missing supplier ID 8% (1 from 12)
Missing buyer ID 0% (0 from 12)
Wrong buyer name 0% (0 from 12)
Call and award notices contradict each other 0% (0 from 12)
Missing call for tenders 33% (4 from 12)

Supplier rating

Do the risky firms win frequently?   detailed info 

80%
average 85%
Type of flaw Contracts count
Supplier founded less than 180 days before contract award 0% (0 from 12)
Supplier with over 75 % of turnover from public procurement 0% (0 from 12)
Subcontractor share above 50 % 17% (2 from 12)
Supplier demise shortly after contract 0% (0 from 12)
Supplier bankruptcy 0% (0 from 12)
Supplier donating to political party 8% (1 from 12)
Supplier did not publish financial results on time 33% (4 from 12)