Small cities • 2016

Město Mohelnice

IČO 00303038

Often makes mistakes in procurement journal announcements.

Bidder participation

Is the level of competition satisfactory?   detailed info 

74%
average 59%
Largest contracts
Industry
Bids
Svoz a zneškodnění komunálního odpadu a provozování sběrného dvora
Služby související s likvidací odpadů a odpady
3
Ø3 in industry
Rekonstrukce ulice Okružní
Výstavba silnic
13
Ø5 in industry
Regenerace panelového sídliště, ul. Stanislavova, Mohelnice
Výstavba silnic
6
Ø5 in industry
Revitalizace zeleně na vybraných plochách města Mohelnice
Zemědělské, lesnické, zahradnické služby a služby v oblasti akvakultury a včelařství
11
Ø5 in industry
Park Pod Hradbami a ul. Školní
Stavební práce
2
Ø5 in industry

Winner concentration

Isn't majority of contracts awarded to small circle of firms?   detailed info 

73%
average 51%
Largest suppliers Contracts count Contracts volume (Kč)
Suez Využití zdrojů a.s.
1 32,160,000
Swietelsky stavební s.r.o.
1 20,992,524
Strabag a.s.
3 19,107,754
Eurovia Cs, a.s.
1 15,873,226
Irstav, s.r.o.
2 12,350,450
Other suppliers 12 27,249,828

Pro-competitive tools

Does the buyer foster the competition by using the available tools?   detailed info 

67%
average 64%
Tool Contracts count
Extended deadlines 0% (0 from 4)
Nonprice competition 75% (3 from 4)
Lots 0% (0 from 4)
E-auction 0% (0 from 4)

Competitive contracting

How often does buyer use non-competitive procedures?   detailed info 

93%
average 84%

Consistent conduct

Does buyer discourage bidders by frequent competition cancellations or modifications?   detailed info 

80%
average 69%
Type of flaw Result
Issued calls without published result 0%
Cancelled contracts 20%
Average requirements modifications count 0

Journal data quality

Does buyer publish vital data in official journal?   detailed info 

57%
average 80%
Type of flaw Contracts count
Bidders count not published 10% (2 from 20)
Final or estimated price not published 35% (7 from 20)
Procedure type not published 0% (0 from 20)
Missing supplier ID 0% (0 from 20)
Missing buyer ID 0% (0 from 20)
Wrong buyer name 0% (0 from 20)
Call and award notices contradict each other 0% (0 from 20)
Missing call for tenders 45% (9 from 20)

Supplier rating

Do the risky firms win frequently?   detailed info 

88%
average 85%
Type of flaw Contracts count
Supplier founded less than 180 days before contract award 0% (0 from 20)
Supplier with over 75 % of turnover from public procurement 0% (0 from 20)
Subcontractor share above 50 % 0% (0 from 20)
Supplier demise shortly after contract 0% (0 from 20)
Supplier bankruptcy 0% (0 from 20)
Supplier donating to political party 5% (1 from 20)
Supplier did not publish financial results on time 40% (8 from 20)