Small cities • 2018 • past ranking

Město Mohelnice

IČO 00303038

Buyer profile lacks mandatory machine readability. Lot of money goes into historical contracts and unregulated purchases.

Bidder participation

Is the level of competition satisfactory?   detailed info 

56%
average 49%
Largest contracts
Industry
Bids
Rekonstrukce ulice Okružní
Výstavba silnic
13
Ø8 in industry
Bezpečnost dopravy v Mohelnici - chodníky
Stavební práce
1
Ø5 in industry
Regenerace panelového sídliště, ul. Stanislavova, Mohelnice
Výstavba silnic
6
Ø8 in industry
Cyklodoprava ve městě Mohelnice a místních částech Libivá a Květín
Stavební práce
9
Ø5 in industry
Mohelnice, Družstevní, smíšená stezka
Výstavba cyklistických stezek
9
Ø5 in industry

Winner concentration

Isn't majority of contracts awarded to small circle of firms?   detailed info 

53%
average 55%
Largest suppliers Contracts count Contracts volume (Kč)
STRABAG a.s.
4 42,844,376
SWIETELSKY stavební s.r.o.
1 20,992,524
EUROVIA CS, a.s.
1 15,873,227
M-SILNICE a.s.
2 8,113,113
PRUKON s.r.o.
2 7,088,504
Other suppliers 2 3,398,131

Pro-competitive tools

Does the buyer foster the competition by using the available tools?   detailed info 

71%
average 59%
Tool Contracts count
Extended deadlines 29% (2 from 7)
Nonprice competition 57% (4 from 7)
Lots 0% (0 from 7)
E-auction 0% (0 from 7)

Public procurement share on total purchases

What fraction of purchases was made under procurement law?   detailed info 

51%
average 66%
Purchases Volume (Kč)
Public procurement 139,196,066
Unregulated purchases 388,059,397
Total 527,255,463

Competitive contracting

How often does buyer use non-competitive procedures?   detailed info 

100%
average 91%
No contracts in negotiated procedure without publication.

Consistent conduct

Does buyer discourage bidders by frequent competition cancellations or modifications?   detailed info 

68%
average 77%
Type of flaw Result
Issued calls without published result 0%
Cancelled contracts 29%
Average requirements modifications count 0.29

Journal data quality

Does buyer publish vital data in official journal?   detailed info 

87%
average 91%
Type of flaw Contracts count
Bidders count not published 0% (0 from 15)
Final or estimated price not published 33% (5 from 15)
Procedure type not published 0% (0 from 15)
Missing supplier ID 0% (0 from 15)
Missing buyer ID 0% (0 from 15)
Wrong buyer name 0% (0 from 15)
Call and award notices contradict each other 0% (0 from 15)
Missing call for tenders 20% (3 from 15)

Buyer profile data quality

Does the buyer profile fulfill the legal requirements?   detailed info 

0%
average 38%
Check Result
Is the buyers website consistent with central procurement registry? 0% (contracts)
Are there obvious flaws or inconsistencies within the data? 1.00 (average mistakes per contract)