Large cities • 2018 • past ranking

Statutární město Jablonec nad Nisou

IČO 00262340

Good buyer. Data on buyer profile have relatively good quality. Buyer does not modify or cancel tenders which fosters competition.

12.
ranking
77%
zIndex

Bidder participation

Is the level of competition satisfactory?   detailed info 

47%
average 52%

Winner concentration

Isn't majority of contracts awarded to small circle of firms?   detailed info 

72%
average 70%
Largest suppliers Contracts count Contracts volume Kč
Metrostav a.s.
1 100,994,125
ENESA a.s.
1 31,985,825
VENTAX s.r.o.
8 27,893,109
LAMA energy a.s.
2 15,652,000
EUROVIA CS, a.s.
1 15,253,500
Other suppliers 37 106,867,546

Pro-competitive tools

Does the buyer foster the competition by using the available tools?   detailed info 

73%
average 71%
Tool Contracts count
Extended deadlines 21% (3 from 14)
Nonprice competition 12% (2 from 16)
Division into lots 0% (0 from 16)
E-auction 19% (3 from 16)
Innovative procedure 0% ( from 16)

Public procurement share on total purchases

What fraction of purchases was made under procurement law?   detailed info 

47%
average 56%
Purchases Volume (Kč)
Public procurement 440,210,564
Small scale tenders 0
Unregulated purchases 1,534,779,016
Total 1,974,989,580

Competitive contracting

How often does buyer use non-competitive procedures?   detailed info 

85%
average 87%

Consistent conduct

Does buyer discourage bidders by frequent competition cancellations or modifications?   detailed info 

88%
average 77%
Type of flaw Result
Issued tenders without published result 0%
Cancelled contracts 6%
Average requirements modifications count 0.56

Journal data quality

Does buyer publish vital data in official journal?   detailed info 

90%
average 90%
Type of flaw Contracts count
Bidders count not published 0% (0 from 56)
Final or estimated price not published 7% (4 from 56)
Procedure type not published 0% (0 from 56)
Missing supplier ID 2% (1 from 56)
Missing buyer ID 2% (1 from 56)
Wrong buyer name 2% (1 from 56)
Missing call for tenders 11% (6 from 56)
Missing winning price 0% ( from 56)
Contract modification by more than 50 % 0% ( from 56)

Buyer profile data quality

Does the buyer profile fulfill the legal requirements?   detailed info 

91%
average 55%
Check Result
Is the buyers website consistent with central procurement registry? 96% (contracts)
Are there obvious flaws or inconsistencies within the data? 0.21 (average mistakes per contract)
Are small scale tenders published on a buyer profile? (Compared to quantity of 52 tenders under the law)
0-250K 0 tenders
250K-500K 0 tenders
500K-1000K 0 tenders
1000K+ 0 tenders