Large cities • 2018 • past ranking

Statutární město Jablonec nad Nisou

IČO 00262340

Good buyer. Data on buyer profile have relatively good quality. Buyer does not modify or cancel tenders which fosters competition.

12.
ranking
77%
zIndex

Bidder participation

Is the level of competition satisfactory?   detailed info 

47%
average 52%
Largest contracts
Industry
Bids
Nový pavilon intenzivní medicíny v Nemocnici Jablonec nad Nisou
Stavební práce
4
Ø5 in industry
Statutární město Jablonec nad Nisou - úspory energií metodou EPC
Energetické a související služby
3
Ø4 in industry
Sportovní areál Sokolí ulice, Jablonec nad Nisou
Výstavba víceúčelových sportovních zařízení
2
Ø5 in industry
Dodávka elektrické energie pro statutární město Jablonec nad Nisou a jím zřizované, zakládané a podporované organizace pro roky 2017 a 2018
Elektrická energie
7
Ø5 in industry
Azylový dům – vícestupňová sociální služba Jablonec nad Nisou
Rekonstrukce budov
9
Ø4 in industry

Winner concentration

Isn't majority of contracts awarded to small circle of firms?   detailed info 

72%
average 70%
Largest suppliers Contracts count Contracts volume Kč
Metrostav a.s.
1 100,994,125
ENESA a.s.
1 31,985,825
VENTAX s.r.o.
8 27,893,109
LAMA energy a.s.
2 15,652,000
EUROVIA CS, a.s.
1 15,253,500
Other suppliers 37 106,867,546

Pro-competitive tools

Does the buyer foster the competition by using the available tools?   detailed info 

73%
average 71%
Tool Contracts count
Extended deadlines 19% (3 from 16)
Nonprice competition 12% (2 from 16)
Lots 0% (0 from 16)
E-auction 19% (3 from 16)
Inovativni 0% ( from 16)

Public procurement share on total purchases

What fraction of purchases was made under procurement law?   detailed info 

47%
average 56%
Purchases Volume (Kč)
Public procurement 440,210,564
Zakazky maleho rozsahu 0
Unregulated purchases 1,534,779,016
Total 1,974,989,580

Competitive contracting

How often does buyer use non-competitive procedures?   detailed info 

85%
average 87%

Consistent conduct

Does buyer discourage bidders by frequent competition cancellations or modifications?   detailed info 

88%
average 77%
Type of flaw Result
Issued calls without published result 0%
Cancelled contracts 6%
Average requirements modifications count 0.56

Journal data quality

Does buyer publish vital data in official journal?   detailed info 

90%
average 90%
Type of flaw Contracts count
Bidders count not published 0% (0 from 56)
Final or estimated price not published 7% (4 from 56)
Procedure type not published 0% (0 from 56)
Missing supplier ID 2% (1 from 56)
Missing buyer ID 2% (1 from 56)
Wrong buyer name 2% (1 from 56)
Missing call for tenders 11% (6 from 56)
Zakazka nema viteznou cenu 0% ( from 56)
Cena byla aktualizovana 0% ( from 56)

Buyer profile data quality

Does the buyer profile fulfill the legal requirements?   detailed info 

91%
average 55%
Check Result
Is the buyers website consistent with central procurement registry? 96% (contracts)
Are there obvious flaws or inconsistencies within the data? 0.21 (average mistakes per contract)
Uveřejňují se na profilu zakázky malého rozsahu? (Poměřujeme proti počtu 52 zakázek v režimu zákona)
0-250K 0 zakázek
250K-500K 0 zakázek
500K-1000K 0 zakázek
1000K+ 0 zakázek