Small cities • 2016

Město Vítkov

IČO 00300870

Good buyer. Tender documentation is well prepared, thus there is no need to modify or cancel the procedure. The competition for contracts is high.

16.
ranking
81%
zIndex

Buyer's statement

Nesouhlasíme s typem chyb v nezveřejnění vítězné ceny nebo předpokládané ceny. Vždy v zadávací dokumentaci VZ je uvedena předpolkádana hodnota díla a na profilu zveřejněna smlouva s cenou. Vše nám dělají externisté , kteří ruří za spravnost a průběh VZ.

zIndex comment

Děkujeme za připomínky, dovolím si několik krátkých vysvětlení:
Zadavatel je povinnen uveřejnit předmětné ceny ve Věstníku i na profilu zadavatele, nejen v zadávací dokumentaci. Pokud neuveřejnění bylo realizováno externisty, mají tito být činěni odpovědnými za porušení relevantních předpisů.

Doufám že tímto jsou vznesené připomínky vysvětleny
za tým zIndex.cz
Jiří Skuhrovec

Bidder participation

Is the level of competition satisfactory?   detailed info 

88%
average 59%

Winner concentration

Isn't majority of contracts awarded to small circle of firms?   detailed info 

62%
average 51%
Largest suppliers Contracts count Contracts volume Kč
Lumius, spol. s r.o.
2 20,094,127
Conte spol. s r.o.
1 16,781,185
Stavební společnost Navrátil, s.r.o.
1 15,739,035
P R O W A L L s.r.o.
1 3,393,357
Meva-tec s.r.o.
1 3,369,885
Other suppliers 5 8,677,572

Pro-competitive tools

Does the buyer foster the competition by using the available tools?   detailed info 

79%
average 64%
Tool Contracts count
Extended deadlines 0% (0 from 4)
Nonprice competition 0% (0 from 4)
Lots 0% (0 from 4)
E-auction 75% (3 from 4)

Competitive contracting

How often does buyer use non-competitive procedures?   detailed info 

100%
average 84%
No contracts in negotiated procedure without publication.

Consistent conduct

Does buyer discourage bidders by frequent competition cancellations or modifications?   detailed info 

100%
average 69%
Type of flaw Result
Issued calls without published result 0%
Cancelled contracts 0%
Average requirements modifications count 0

Journal data quality

Does buyer publish vital data in official journal?   detailed info 

80%
average 80%
Type of flaw Contracts count
Bidders count not published 0% (0 from 11)
Final or estimated price not published 36% (4 from 11)
Procedure type not published 0% (0 from 11)
Missing supplier ID 0% (0 from 11)
Missing buyer ID 0% (0 from 11)
Wrong buyer name 0% (0 from 11)
Call and award notices contradict each other 9% (1 from 11)
Missing call for tenders 18% (2 from 11)

Supplier rating

Do the risky firms win frequently?   detailed info 

87%
average 85%
Type of flaw Contracts count
Supplier founded less than 180 days before contract award 0% (0 from 11)
Supplier with over 75 % of turnover from public procurement 0% (0 from 11)
Subcontractor share above 50 % 0% (0 from 11)
Supplier demise shortly after contract 0% (0 from 11)
Supplier bankruptcy 0% (0 from 11)
Supplier donating to political party 0% (0 from 11)
Supplier did not publish financial results on time 18% (2 from 11)