Small cities • 2016

Město Hrádek nad Nisou

IČO 00262854

The supplier portfolio is relatively broad. Buyer does not use tools to support competition.

Bidder participation

Is the level of competition satisfactory?   detailed info 

52%
average 59%

Winner concentration

Isn't majority of contracts awarded to small circle of firms?   detailed info 

75%
average 51%
Largest suppliers Contracts count Contracts volume Kč
Metrostav a.s.
1 19,448,425
Aqua - Gas, s.r.o.
1 9,298,123
Voka Cl s.r.o.
1 8,105,217
Emh stavební Cz s.r.o.
1 6,665,615
Astra Mont s.r.o.
1 5,982,041
Other suppliers 11 23,547,030

Pro-competitive tools

Does the buyer foster the competition by using the available tools?   detailed info 

50%
average 64%
Tool Contracts count
Extended deadlines 0% (0 from 0)
Nonprice competition 0% (0 from 2)
Division into lots 0% (0 from 2)
E-auction 0% (0 from 2)
Innovative procedure 0% ( from 2)

Competitive contracting

How often does buyer use non-competitive procedures?   detailed info 

94%
average 84%
Contract
Reason for negotiated procedure without publication
Original contract (Kč) Contract modification / NPWP (Kč)
Oprava ulic a mostů po povodních (D, E, F, H, I, J) - funkční celek H - dodatečné práce č.2
Dodatečné práce
- 522,845
Oprava ulic a mostů po povodních 2010 (K, L, M) - Funkční celek L
Dodatečné práce
- 388,366
Oprava ulic a mostů po povodních 2010 (D, E, F, H, I, J) - Funkční celek F - dodatečné práce č.2
Dodatečné práce
- 122,401

Consistent conduct

Does buyer discourage bidders by frequent competition cancellations or modifications?   detailed info 

67%
average 69%
Type of flaw Result
Issued tenders without published result 33%
Cancelled contracts 0%
Average requirements modifications count 0

Journal data quality

Does buyer publish vital data in official journal?   detailed info 

68%
average 80%
Type of flaw Contracts count
Bidders count not published 0% (0 from 16)
Final or estimated price not published 19% (3 from 16)
Procedure type not published 0% (0 from 16)
Missing supplier ID 0% (0 from 16)
Missing buyer ID 0% (0 from 16)
Wrong buyer name 0% (0 from 16)
Missing call for tenders 12% (2 from 16)
Missing winning price 0% ( from 16)
Contract modification by more than 50 % 0% ( from 16)

Supplier rating

Do the risky firms win frequently?   detailed info 

85%
average 85%
Type of flaw Contracts count
Supplier founded less than 180 days before contract award 6% (1 from 16)
Supplier with over 75 % of turnover from public procurement 6% (1 from 16)
Subcontractor share above 50 % 0% (0 from 16)
Supplier demise shortly after contract 0% (0 from 16)
Supplier bankruptcy 0% (0 from 16)
Supplier donating to political party 6% (1 from 16)
Supplier did not publish financial results on time 12% (2 from 16)