Small cities • 2018 • past ranking

Město Náchod

IČO 00272868

Buyer profile is in relatively good shape. Procurement journal misses vital information (prices, suppliers..).

Bidder participation

Is the level of competition satisfactory?   detailed info 

31%
average 49%
Largest contracts
Industry
Bids
Rekonstrukce chodníků a zřízení cyklistických pruhů na ulicích Českoskalická, Pražská v Náchodě - II. etapa
Chodníky a jiné zpevněné povrchy
4
Ø5 in industry
Rekonstrukce veřejného stadionu Hamra v Náchodě
Stavební úpravy sportovních zařízení
2
Ø3 in industry
Malé lázně - Běloves
Stavební práce
3
Ø5 in industry
Chodník a komunikace Nemastova ulice v Náchodě
Stavební práce
5
Ø5 in industry
Výběrové řízení na dodavatele stavebních prací pro projekt: "MOST PŘES METUJI NÁCHOD, BĚLOVĚS - LÁZEŇSKÁ ULICE"
Stavební úpravy pro komunikace
10
Ø7 in industry

Winner concentration

Isn't majority of contracts awarded to small circle of firms?   detailed info 

73%
average 55%
Largest suppliers Contracts count Contracts volume Kč
SOVIS CZ, a.s.
4 48,855,904
EKKL a.s.
1 29,564,327
Průmstav Náchod s.r.o.
3 18,900,619
GREEN PROJECT s.r.o.
1 18,386,663
EUROVIA CS, a.s.
2 12,361,116
Other suppliers 13 49,022,555

Public procurement share on total purchases

What fraction of purchases was made under procurement law?   detailed info 

53%
average 66%
Purchases Volume (Kč)
Public procurement 303,006,112
Unregulated purchases 758,591,042
Total 1,061,597,153

Competitive contracting

How often does buyer use non-competitive procedures?   detailed info 

86%
average 91%

Journal data quality

Does buyer publish vital data in official journal?   detailed info 

70%
average 91%
Type of flaw Contracts count
Bidders count not published 3% (1 from 33)
Final or estimated price not published 3% (1 from 33)
Procedure type not published 0% (0 from 33)
Missing supplier ID 0% (0 from 33)
Missing buyer ID 3% (1 from 33)
Wrong buyer name 21% (7 from 33)
Call and award notices contradict each other 0% (0 from 33)
Missing call for tenders 27% (9 from 33)

Buyer profile data quality

Does the buyer profile fulfill the legal requirements?   detailed info 

71%
average 38%
Check Result
Is the buyers website consistent with central procurement registry? 88% (contracts)
Are there obvious flaws or inconsistencies within the data? 0.69 (average mistakes per contract)