Large cities • 2016

Město Třinec

IČO 00297313

Court deemed all complaints against buyer invalid or insignificant. Buyer does not support competition by using e-auctions, lots or extended deadlines.

29.
ranking
72%
zIndex

Bidder participation

Is the level of competition satisfactory?   detailed info 

64%
average 63%

Winner concentration

Isn't majority of contracts awarded to small circle of firms?   detailed info 

80%
average 76%
Largest suppliers Contracts count Contracts volume Kč
Beskydská stavební, a.s.
4 69,206,164
Bdstav Morava s.r.o.
1 28,746,820
Vítkovice Revmont a.s.
2 21,738,597
Master It Technologies, a.s.
1 17,758,970
Milan Holec stavební firma s.r.o.
4 15,505,419
Other suppliers 39 115,194,672

Public procurement share on total purchases

What fraction of purchases was made under procurement law?   detailed info 

49%
average 57%
Purchases Volume (Kč)
Public procurement 268,150,647
Unregulated purchases 831,647,674
Total 1,099,798,321

Competitive contracting

How often does buyer use non-competitive procedures?   detailed info 

86%
average 77%
Contract
Reason for negotiated procedure without publication
Price (Kč)
Přestupní terminál Třinec - dodatečné práce II
Dodatečné práce
2,511,787
ZŠ Dany a Emila Zátopkových, Třinec-tělocvična - dodatečné práce I
Dodatečné práce
2,158,964
Rekonstrukce tělocvičny ZŠ Koperníkova v Třinci – vícepráce 1
Dodatečné práce
2,097,559
Rekonstrukce tělocvičny ZŠ Koperníkova v Třinci - vícepráce 2
Dodatečné práce
657,189
Přestupní terminál Třinec - dodatečné práce III
Dodatečné práce
657,189

Consistent conduct

Does buyer discourage bidders by frequent competition cancellations or modifications?   detailed info 

69%
average 65%
Type of flaw Result
Issued calls without published result 7%
Cancelled contracts 7%
Average requirements modifications count 0.62

Journal data quality

Does buyer publish vital data in official journal?   detailed info 

83%
average 83%
Type of flaw Contracts count
Bidders count not published 2% (1 from 52)
Final or estimated price not published 23% (12 from 52)
Procedure type not published 0% (0 from 52)
Missing supplier ID 6% (3 from 52)
Missing buyer ID 0% (0 from 52)
Wrong buyer name 0% (0 from 52)
Call and award notices contradict each other 0% (0 from 52)
Missing call for tenders 2% (1 from 52)

Buyer profile data quality

Does the buyer profile fulfill the legal requirements?   detailed info 

46%
average 46%
Check Result
Is the buyers website consistent with central procurement registry? 46% (contracts)
Are there obvious flaws or inconsistencies within the data? 0.03 (average mistakes per contract)

Supplier rating

Do the risky firms win frequently?   detailed info 

77%
average 84%
Type of flaw Contracts count
Supplier founded less than 180 days before contract award 0% (0 from 52)
Supplier with over 75 % of turnover from public procurement 0% (0 from 52)
Subcontractor share above 50 % 0% (0 from 52)
Supplier demise shortly after contract 0% (0 from 52)
Supplier bankruptcy 0% (0 from 52)
Supplier donating to political party 25% (13 from 52)
Supplier did not publish financial results on time 17% (9 from 52)