City parts • 2016

Městská část Praha 17

IČO 00231223

Good buyer. Enough firms are competing for contracts. Buyer does not modify or cancel tenders which fosters competition.

1.
ranking
84%
zIndex

Bidder participation

Is the level of competition satisfactory?   detailed info 

91%
average 53%
Largest contracts
Industry
Bids
Rekonstrukce Kulturního střediska Průhon, Socháňova 1220, Praha 6 - Řepy
Stavební úpravy uměleckých a kulturních budov
24
Ø3 in industry
„Zateplení objektu, rekonstrukce varny se zázemím a zřízení nové třídy v MŠ Socháňova 1175 a 1176, Praha 6 - Řepy"
Stavební úpravy budov mateřských škol
7
Ø5 in industry
Zateplení ZŠ Laudova 1024,Praha 6 - Řepy
Stavební úpravy školních budov
9
Ø5 in industry
Aktivní lesopark Řepy
Zařízení parků a hřišť
4
Ø3 in industry
„Přístavba zázemí a rekonstrukce sportovišť v ZŠ genpor. Františka Peřiny, Laudova 1024, Praha 6 - Řepy"
Vyrovnávání povrchu pro sportoviště
3
Ø4 in industry

Winner concentration

Isn't majority of contracts awarded to small circle of firms?   detailed info 

75%
average 63%
Largest suppliers Contracts count Contracts volume Kč
Energie - stavební a báňská a.s.
2 46,679,012
Nika Stav spol. s r.o.
2 22,727,274
Domistav Cz a.s.
2 11,834,204
Gardenline s.r.o.
1 11,603,910
Orsmix s.r.o.
2 9,449,967
Other suppliers 19 53,530,790

Pro-competitive tools

Does the buyer foster the competition by using the available tools?   detailed info 

68%
average 62%
Tool Contracts count
Extended deadlines 0% (4 from 0)
Nonprice competition 83% (5 from 6)
Division into lots 0% (0 from 6)
E-auction 0% (0 from 6)
Innovative procedure 0% ( from 6)

Competitive contracting

How often does buyer use non-competitive procedures?   detailed info 

100%
average 81%
No contracts in negotiated procedure without publication.

Consistent conduct

Does buyer discourage bidders by frequent competition cancellations or modifications?   detailed info 

86%
average 67%
Type of flaw Result
Issued tenders without published result 0%
Cancelled contracts 0%
Average requirements modifications count 0.57

Journal data quality

Does buyer publish vital data in official journal?   detailed info 

79%
average 88%
Type of flaw Contracts count
Bidders count not published 0% (0 from 28)
Final or estimated price not published 11% (3 from 28)
Procedure type not published 0% (0 from 28)
Missing supplier ID 11% (3 from 28)
Missing buyer ID 0% (0 from 28)
Wrong buyer name 0% (0 from 28)
Missing call for tenders 18% (5 from 28)
Missing winning price 0% ( from 28)
Contract modification by more than 50 % 0% ( from 28)

Supplier rating

Do the risky firms win frequently?   detailed info 

95%
average 85%
Type of flaw Contracts count
Supplier founded less than 180 days before contract award 0% (0 from 28)
Supplier with over 75 % of turnover from public procurement 0% (0 from 28)
Subcontractor share above 50 % 4% (1 from 28)
Supplier demise shortly after contract 0% (0 from 28)
Supplier bankruptcy 0% (0 from 28)
Supplier donating to political party 0% (0 from 28)
Supplier did not publish financial results on time 18% (5 from 28)