Large cities • 2016

Město Strakonice

IČO 00251810

Buyer profile has high number of errors. The competition for contracts is low.

Bidder participation

Is the level of competition satisfactory?   detailed info 

33%
average 63%
Largest contracts
Industry
Bids
ÚV PRACEJOVICE - REKONSTRUKCE A MODERNIZACE
Stavební práce na výstavbě úpraven vody
3
Ø4 in industry
Poskytnutí bankovních služeb ve formě úvěru či úvěrových linek nebo směnečného emisního programu
Finanční služby
3
Ø4 in industry
Stavební úpravy – Strakonice, Velké náměstí čp. 1, čp. 2, čp. 270
Stavební úpravy domů
3
Ø4 in industry
Zateplení a výměna oken sportovní haly STARZ, Strakonice
Rekonstrukce budov
4
Ø5 in industry
Revitalizace sídliště Mír, Strakonice - III.etapa - náměstíčko, parkoviště u pivovaru
Stavební úpravy pro komunikace
9
Ø5 in industry

Winner concentration

Isn't majority of contracts awarded to small circle of firms?   detailed info 

51%
average 76%
Largest suppliers Contracts count Contracts volume Kč
Arko Technology, a.s.
1 172,006,579
Komerční banka, a.s.
1 31,971,885
E.on Energie, a.s.
2 20,469,078
Prima, akciová společnost
2 19,244,443
Protom Strakonice, s.r.o.
1 16,710,334
Other suppliers 13 74,557,925

Public procurement share on total purchases

What fraction of purchases was made under procurement law?   detailed info 

69%
average 57%
Purchases Volume (Kč)
Public procurement 335,636,559
Small scale tenders 0
Unregulated purchases 376,641,478
Total 712,278,037

Competitive contracting

How often does buyer use non-competitive procedures?   detailed info 

100%
average 77%
No contracts in negotiated procedure without publication.

Consistent conduct

Does buyer discourage bidders by frequent competition cancellations or modifications?   detailed info 

63%
average 65%
Type of flaw Result
Issued tenders without published result 0%
Cancelled contracts 31%
Average requirements modifications count 0.50

Journal data quality

Does buyer publish vital data in official journal?   detailed info 

93%
average 83%
Type of flaw Contracts count
Bidders count not published 0% (0 from 20)
Final or estimated price not published 10% (2 from 20)
Procedure type not published 0% (0 from 20)
Missing supplier ID 5% (1 from 20)
Missing buyer ID 0% (0 from 20)
Wrong buyer name 0% (0 from 20)
Missing call for tenders 10% (2 from 20)
Missing winning price 0% ( from 20)
Contract modification by more than 50 % 0% ( from 20)

Buyer profile data quality

Does the buyer profile fulfill the legal requirements?   detailed info 

3%
average 46%
Check Result
Is the buyers website consistent with central procurement registry? 4% (contracts)
Are there obvious flaws or inconsistencies within the data? 0.70 (average mistakes per contract)
Are small scale tenders published on a buyer profile? (Compared to quantity of tenders under the law)
0-250K 0 tenders
250K-500K 0 tenders
500K-1000K 0 tenders
1000K+ 0 tenders

Supplier rating

Do the risky firms win frequently?   detailed info 

96%
average 84%
Type of flaw Contracts count
Supplier founded less than 180 days before contract award 0% (0 from 20)
Supplier with over 75 % of turnover from public procurement 0% (0 from 20)
Subcontractor share above 50 % 0% (0 from 20)
Supplier demise shortly after contract 0% (0 from 20)
Supplier bankruptcy 0% (0 from 20)
Supplier donating to political party 5% (1 from 20)
Supplier did not publish financial results on time 20% (4 from 20)