Large cities • 2018 • past ranking

Město Strakonice

IČO 00251810

Buyer profile lacks mandatory machine readability. The competition for contracts is high.

28.
ranking
73%
zIndex

Bidder participation

Is the level of competition satisfactory?   detailed info 

75%
average 52%
Largest contracts
Industry
Bids
Rekonstrukce komunikace ul. Šv. Dudáka, Strakonice
Stavební práce
7
Ø5 in industry
Stavební úpravy ulice Poděbradova, Strakonice
Stavební práce
11
Ø5 in industry
Revitalizace sídliště Mír, Strakonice - III.etapa - náměstíčko, parkoviště u pivovaru
Stavební úpravy pro komunikace
9
Ø7 in industry
Cyklostezka Strakonice, Nový Dražejov
Výstavba cyklistických stezek
7
Ø5 in industry
Páteřní cyklostezka, Strakonice - SO 106 - podél Volyňky
Výstavba cyklistických stezek
12
Ø5 in industry

Winner concentration

Isn't majority of contracts awarded to small circle of firms?   detailed info 

68%
average 70%
Largest suppliers Contracts count Contracts volume Kč
ZNAKON, a.s.
1 32,479,938
ROBSTAV stavby k.s.
1 15,449,260
EUROVIA CS, a.s.
1 13,341,703
Casta dopravní stavby s.r.o.
2 9,594,770
SWIETELSKY stavební s.r.o.
1 5,936,952
Other suppliers 9 19,924,853

Public procurement share on total purchases

What fraction of purchases was made under procurement law?   detailed info 

62%
average 56%
Purchases Volume (Kč)
Public procurement 407,344,169
Unregulated purchases 638,735,991
Total 1,046,080,160

Competitive contracting

How often does buyer use non-competitive procedures?   detailed info 

100%
average 87%
No contracts in negotiated procedure without publication.

Consistent conduct

Does buyer discourage bidders by frequent competition cancellations or modifications?   detailed info 

66%
average 77%

Journal data quality

Does buyer publish vital data in official journal?   detailed info 

94%
average 90%
Type of flaw Contracts count
Bidders count not published 6% (1 from 18)
Final or estimated price not published 22% (4 from 18)
Procedure type not published 0% (0 from 18)
Missing supplier ID 0% (0 from 18)
Missing buyer ID 0% (0 from 18)
Wrong buyer name 6% (1 from 18)
Call and award notices contradict each other 0% (0 from 18)
Missing call for tenders 22% (4 from 18)

Buyer profile data quality

Does the buyer profile fulfill the legal requirements?   detailed info 

28%
average 55%
Check Result
Is the buyers website consistent with central procurement registry? 50% (contracts)
Are there obvious flaws or inconsistencies within the data? 0.88 (average mistakes per contract)