Small cities • 2016

Město Moravská Třebová

IČO 00277037

Small number of firms does not recieve majority of contracts. Procurement journal misses vital information (prices, suppliers..).

Bidder participation

Is the level of competition satisfactory?   detailed info 

66%
average 59%
Largest contracts
Industry
Bids
Realizace úspor energie - ZŠ Palackého, Moravská Třebová
Stavební úpravy uměleckých a kulturních budov
7
Ø3 in industry
Moravská Třebová – projekt odkanalizování Udánek, Sušic, Boršova a modernizace ČOV – změny v Udánkách a Boršově
Stavební práce na výstavbě kanalizace
6
Ø5 in industry
Odkanalizování Udánek, Sušic, Boršova a modernizace ČOV - dodatečné stavební práce
Stavební práce na výstavbě kanalizace
1
Ø5 in industry
Poskytování energetických služeb metodou EPC ve vybraných objektech v majetku města Moravská Třebová
Energetické a související služby
5
Ø3 in industry
III. ETAPA výstavby TI pro 14 RD na ul. Strážnického, Moravská Třebová
Stavební práce
5
Ø5 in industry

Winner concentration

Isn't majority of contracts awarded to small circle of firms?   detailed info 

77%
average 51%
Largest suppliers Contracts count Contracts volume (Kč)
Fortex - Ags, a.s.
5 26,860,826
Metrostav a.s.
1 24,751,743
Hochtief Cz a. s.
2 19,451,967
Amper Savings, a.s.
1 13,611,859
Ekoterm Cz s.r.o.
1 8,215,455
Other suppliers 26 39,391,463

Pro-competitive tools

Does the buyer foster the competition by using the available tools?   detailed info 

61%
average 64%
Tool Contracts count
Extended deadlines 67% (2 from 3)
Nonprice competition 33% (1 from 3)
Lots 0% (0 from 3)
E-auction 0% (0 from 3)

Competitive contracting

How often does buyer use non-competitive procedures?   detailed info 

77%
average 84%

Consistent conduct

Does buyer discourage bidders by frequent competition cancellations or modifications?   detailed info 

63%
average 69%
Type of flaw Result
Issued calls without published result 0%
Cancelled contracts 25%
Average requirements modifications count 0.50

Journal data quality

Does buyer publish vital data in official journal?   detailed info 

70%
average 80%
Type of flaw Contracts count
Bidders count not published 0% (0 from 36)
Final or estimated price not published 39% (14 from 36)
Procedure type not published 0% (0 from 36)
Missing supplier ID 6% (2 from 36)
Missing buyer ID 0% (0 from 36)
Wrong buyer name 0% (0 from 36)
Call and award notices contradict each other 0% (0 from 36)
Missing call for tenders 19% (7 from 36)

Supplier rating

Do the risky firms win frequently?   detailed info 

79%
average 85%
Type of flaw Contracts count
Supplier founded less than 180 days before contract award 0% (0 from 36)
Supplier with over 75 % of turnover from public procurement 0% (0 from 36)
Subcontractor share above 50 % 8% (3 from 36)
Supplier demise shortly after contract 0% (0 from 36)
Supplier bankruptcy 3% (1 from 36)
Supplier donating to political party 17% (6 from 36)
Supplier did not publish financial results on time 17% (6 from 36)