Small cities • 2016

Město Lovosice

IČO 00263991

Large volume of money is spent without open competition. Buyer recieves unusually small ammount of bids.

Bidder participation

Is the level of competition satisfactory?   detailed info 

32%
average 59%
Largest contracts
Industry
Bids
Revitalizace Pfannschmidtovy vily
Stavební práce
4
Ø5 in industry
POJIŠTĚNÍ MAJETKU, POJIŠTĚNÍ ODPOVĚDNOSTI ZA ŠKODU A POJIŠTĚNÍ VOZIDEL MĚSTA LOVOSIC
Pojištění majetku
2
Ø2 in industry
Rekultivace skládky TKO a inertních odpadů v lokalitě Travčice - k.ú. Počaply
Čištění nebo sanace znečištěné půdy
4
Ø4 in industry
POJIŠTĚNÍ MAJETKU, POJIŠTĚNÍ ODPOVĚDNOSTI ZA ŠKODU A POJIŠTĚNÍ VOZIDEL MĚSTA LOVOSICE
Pojištění majetku
2
Ø2 in industry
Rekonstrukce zimního stadionu včetně ubytovny po povodních
Stavební práce
3
Ø5 in industry

Winner concentration

Isn't majority of contracts awarded to small circle of firms?   detailed info 

70%
average 51%
Largest suppliers Contracts count Contracts volume Kč
Čsob Pojišťovna, a. s., člen holdingu Čsob
3 75,529,942
Raeder & Falge s.r.o.
5 39,632,490
Avers, spol. s r.o.
1 38,808,660
Aquatest a.s.
1 33,274,245
Centroprojekt Group a.s.
2 17,115,050
Other suppliers 13 47,538,204

Pro-competitive tools

Does the buyer foster the competition by using the available tools?   detailed info 

61%
average 64%
Tool Contracts count
Extended deadlines 25% (1 from 4)
Nonprice competition 50% (2 from 4)
Lots 0% (0 from 4)
E-auction 0% (0 from 4)

Competitive contracting

How often does buyer use non-competitive procedures?   detailed info 

52%
average 84%

Consistent conduct

Does buyer discourage bidders by frequent competition cancellations or modifications?   detailed info 

54%
average 69%
Type of flaw Result
Issued calls without published result 14%
Cancelled contracts 17%
Average requirements modifications count 1.33

Journal data quality

Does buyer publish vital data in official journal?   detailed info 

93%
average 80%
Type of flaw Contracts count
Bidders count not published 0% (0 from 25)
Final or estimated price not published 4% (1 from 25)
Procedure type not published 0% (0 from 25)
Missing supplier ID 0% (0 from 25)
Missing buyer ID 0% (0 from 25)
Wrong buyer name 0% (0 from 25)
Call and award notices contradict each other 0% (0 from 25)
Missing call for tenders 4% (1 from 25)

Supplier rating

Do the risky firms win frequently?   detailed info 

91%
average 85%
Type of flaw Contracts count
Supplier founded less than 180 days before contract award 0% (0 from 25)
Supplier with over 75 % of turnover from public procurement 0% (0 from 25)
Subcontractor share above 50 % 0% (0 from 25)
Supplier demise shortly after contract 0% (0 from 25)
Supplier bankruptcy 0% (0 from 25)
Supplier donating to political party 20% (5 from 25)
Supplier did not publish financial results on time 8% (2 from 25)